pr-man 1 Posted August 11, 2000 Im just wondering how the OS runs. Is it quicker than win98? Is it more or less stable than Win2k? I know its just in beta but I just want to here some testimonials. Does most software run on it now? ------------------ ***TRUST YOUR TECHNOLUST*** Share this post Link to post
EddiE314 0 Posted August 11, 2000 its not fair to compare a beta OS to a Retail Gold OS for the simple fact that it is what it is...beta. I thought that build 2223 was very unstable, i always got explorer.exe crashes, as for build 2250 or 2252 i don't know, i haven't used it yet. Share this post Link to post
ras 0 Posted August 11, 2000 Whistler is just windows 2000 with a few gui changes thats it i would not bother wasting your time its okay but nothing to shout about dont waste your bandwidth!!! As for people saying does it runs faster no because it is in essence windows 2000 at the moment. [This message has been edited by ras (edited 11 August 2000).] Share this post Link to post
Four and Twenty 0 Posted August 11, 2000 I use it more than win 2k it is more reliable cooler looking and faster. It does not agree with winamp though. ------------------ My System Dell Demension XPS T500 Triple Boot Windows 2000 Pro 2195 / Windows Whistler Pro 2250 / Windows Millennium Final PIII @ 500 Mhz (with after market heatsink and dual fan) 128 Megs PC133 Ram TNT2 Ultra Graphics Card (with the core and memory overclocked by 20 Mhz and dual voodoo coolers) 3Com 10/100 Ethernet Card 3Com 56k Modem 12.6 Gig IBM HD 40X CD Rom Drive 100 Mb Zip Drive Share this post Link to post
jdulmage 0 Posted August 15, 2000 so far..whistler is going great...yes, it's a hell of a lot faster...and because I know a beta tester for it, I get all the beta releases. goto www.flukex.com for more information Share this post Link to post
