Jmax3 0 Posted November 7, 2005 I have finally made the switch to Linux . After testing several distro's I went with Ubuntu 5.10. I would like to find out how to increase refresh rate for the monitor. My monitor is a NEC MultiSync FE700 capable of 85 hertz . I can't set it above 60 hertz with the screen res. preferances . (85 hertz is much more pleasing to the eyes) Any Idea what I can do ?.................Thanks in advance for any help HP Pavillion A230n Nforce2 on board graphics NEC MultiSync FE700 monitor running Ubuntu 5.10 Share this post Link to post
ruel24 0 Posted November 7, 2005 As sudo, open an editor and the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file and navigate to the section 'Monitor'. With another console, type the following: 'sudo gtf <horiz> <vert> <refresh>', where if the resolution was 1280x1024 and the refresh rate was 80 Hz, then it would be 'sudo gtf 1280 1024 80'. Now highlight the output and copy it to the clipboard and paste it in the 'Monitor' section of xorg.conf. It should look something like this: Section "Monitor" Identifier "Samsung" Option "DPMS" # 1280x1024 @ 80.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 85.76 kHz; pclk: 149.57 MHz Modeline "1280x1024_80.00" 149.57 1280 1376 1512 1744 1024 1025 1028 1072 -HSync +Vsync EndSection Change the 'Screen' section reference to the old resolution/refresh by editing, in this instance, '"1280x1024"' to be what the mode generated, which would have been '"1280x1024_80.00"' in each color depth section. It should look something like this: Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024_80.00" "1280x960" "1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection Do this for all of your resolutions you intend to use in each color depth section. Save the file and restart the Xserver. Make note of your changes. If it fails to go into X, then edit the file from the command line with Nano by typing 'sudo nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf' and fix it. Share this post Link to post
dleon 0 Posted November 7, 2005 Is a higher or lower refresh rate better for your eyes? Share this post Link to post
Jmax3 0 Posted November 7, 2005 I'm not sure , I know that a higher refresh rate does not give me headaches looking at the screen for hours at a time. As for ruel24 's answer to my question , I see what your doing but Ubuntu wont let me make changes ,you have the answer, I just have to figure out how to apply it, will keep working on it. thanks [Edited by jmax3 on 2005-11-07 04:17:40] Share this post Link to post
ruel24 0 Posted November 7, 2005 Will it not let you change the file? You have to launch the editor from a console with 'sudo' in front of the command to get root privileges that you need to edit system files. So, to launch Kate, for instance, you'd type 'sudo kate' from a console, followed by your user password at the prompt and it'll be launched with root permissions and you can change the file. Same goes for editors such as Nano, which every Ubuntu distro should have (running Kubuntu, the KDE version of Ubuntu, right now, myself). You could type 'sudo nano /etc/X11/xorg.conf' with your password at the prompt and it should let you edit the file and save it without problems. Nano is very easy to use, too. Just ctrl-G for help and it'll get you going past the given commands on the screen. Pretty easy for a command line editor. In the old days, you absolutely had to edit this file (it was actually XF86Config back then but the very same file) by hand to get your video setup. This method should work in every distro out there. Share this post Link to post
ruel24 0 Posted November 7, 2005 For the record, Ubuntu is more suited to people that have at least some Linux experience. Many things such as video are still hand edited if not automatically setup correctly, unlike distros like Mandriva that have fancy GUI administrative tools to set those things up. You'll learn more with Ubuntu, but your life would be easier with Mandriva as a beginner. As an experienced user, you'll appreciate Unbuntu's package management, which is actually from Debian, which Ubuntu is just a more cutting edge version of. Just be aware that overall Ubuntu is a great distro, but it does have learning curve. As long as you're willing to take that journey and stick it out, you'll be fine. But, if you're one of those that would rather have a slick graphical way of doing something that's nearly automagical, then Mandriva would be a better answer. Many new users run right back to Windows after using more involved distros like Debian/Ubuntu. Share this post Link to post