3dmarks in WIN 2000 are low

I scored a 5100 with my system in WIN98, so I decided to load 3dmarks2000 and give it a shot while I have WIN2000 loaded. 2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000. Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is pract...




Topic Options
#48624 - 03/15/00 11:17 PM 3dmarks in WIN 2000 are low
Unrealistic Offline
stranger

Registered: 03/12/00
Posts: 15
I scored a 5100 with my system in WIN98, so I decided to load 3dmarks2000 and give it a shot while I have WIN2000 loaded.

2848 is what I scored. I went from a 5100 in WIN 98 to a 2848 in WIN2000.

Of course every driver on my WIN 2000 is practically beta still. To include my ATA 66 drivers. But, I was not expecting such a low score.

Also, the drivers I used are the NVIDIA 3.66 ones as they seem the most stable in WIN2000 at the moment.

Every game still plays smooth and silky though and I guess that is the most important thing.

Maybe the 3dmarks 2000 is not optimized for WIN2000 too?



------------------
PIII650 @ 728
Abit BE6-2
256MB PC 100
3D Prophet SDR 32MB

Top
Advertisement
#48625 - 03/17/00 12:42 AM Re: 3dmarks in WIN 2000 are low
CM Offline
addict

Registered: 07/28/99
Posts: 440
No, its the 3.66 NVIDIA driver.

Top


Forums
Windows Support Forums
Everything New Technology
Legacy OS
Hardware
Software
Games
Networking
Customization & Tweaking
Security

Linux Support Forums
Everything Linux
Linux Hardware
Linux Software
Linux Games
Linux Networking
Linux Customization & Tweaking
Linux Security

Apple Support Forums
Everything Apple
Recent Topics
Computer Repair Utility Kit
by gailerl
Today at 01:26 PM
x86 OS, RAM, & Virtual Machines
by Myke
12/22/09 08:16 PM
Ram Question
by JohnnyAshes
12/21/09 09:50 PM
NEWBIE needs help with REALTEK
by SerryJW
12/21/09 06:09 AM
What version of Linux is this?
by DxxLinux
12/15/09 07:59 PM
Who's Online
2 Registered (cqws, xonager), 256 Guests and 38 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
91406 Members
24 Forums
59294 Topics
189822 Posts

Max Online: 1079 @ 03/12/08 01:36 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22