Guys which of these AV are better?

kaspersky antivirus personal pro mcafee virus scan pro 8 Pc-cillin 2004 NOD32...




Topic Options
#137594 - 04/06/04 05:31 AM Guys which of these AV are better?
pr-man Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/19/00
Posts: 1030
Loc: Lafayette, LA
kaspersky antivirus personal pro

mcafee virus scan pro 8

Pc-cillin 2004

NOD32

Top
Advertisement
#137617 - 04/06/04 05:49 PM Re: Guys which of these AV are better?
Slice Offline
stranger

Registered: 02/28/02
Posts: 2
For me Nod32 hands down.

I have tried many virus killers, and used a few at work.

NOD32 has superb speed, very high detection rate, and importantly very low on system resources! Currently at work I use Sophos (slowphos as it's effectionately know in some circles). The resident programs etc take up over 15MB - similar resident protection in NOD32 use around 10MB.



Top
#137624 - 04/07/04 01:50 AM Re: Guys which of these AV are better?
Marker0077 Offline
journeyman

Registered: 02/01/04
Posts: 88
McAfee is not that great & PC-Cillin is even worse. I highly recommend you going with Norton AntiVirus; It recieved the highest recommendations from PC Magazine.

Personally, I use Norton AntiVirus Corporation. There's no CD-Key's to hassle with, it uses less resources than the traditional Norton AntiVirus Pro (which means the computer runs more smoothly) & it uses pretty much the same virus scanning system = much better IMO.

Top
#137781 - 04/12/04 08:43 PM Re: Guys which of these AV are better?
PHINESTEIN Offline
stranger

Registered: 03/02/04
Posts: 1
pr man:
I can not speculate on Nod32 as I've not used it. I can strongly caution you to veer away from AVG. NAV & McAffee are good but they are the biggest resource hogs! I've opted for Trend Micro P-Cillin. Blazing fast speed and unparalleled updates. Some apps perform better for some machines vs. another which is a factor to consider as well.I hope that whatever your choice may be that it works for you, that's what really matters,
"Phine"

Top
#138373 - 04/30/04 03:14 AM Re: Guys which of these AV are better?
anz Offline
stranger

Registered: 04/30/04
Posts: 5
I have tried Norton which screwed my system up, also had manually uninstall it all. Antivir personal was pretty good but ugly and limited, Avg is intrusive and doesn`t allways update,Panda AV is garbage leaves stuff all over the place. Im using PCCillin at the moment which is very good built in web filter, built in firewall, realtime monitor, emergency lock easy updates and easy to use. God don`t i go on, anyway it`s usually down to personal preference and dosh.
NAV=0 AVG=7 ANTIVIR=8 PANDA=-10 PCCILLIN=10

Top


Forums
Windows Support Forums
Everything New Technology
Legacy OS
Hardware
Software
Games
Networking
Customization & Tweaking
Security

Linux Support Forums
Everything Linux
Linux Hardware
Linux Software
Linux Games
Linux Networking
Linux Customization & Tweaking
Linux Security

Apple Support Forums
Everything Apple
Recent Topics
What version of Linux is this?
by DxxLinux
12/15/09 07:59 PM
Anything like HyperCam?
by Luckycharm8989
12/11/09 02:08 PM
Thank you for your help
by guaiguai
12/11/09 07:29 AM
What the problem is?
by guaiguai
12/11/09 05:09 AM
Need an database for Dictionary
by shaanspecial
12/09/09 10:19 AM
Who's Online
0 Registered (), 174 Guests and 33 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
91336 Members
24 Forums
58986 Topics
189499 Posts

Max Online: 1079 @ 03/12/08 01:36 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22