I haven't actually updated my MCP qualifications for a while.
In fact the last official qualifications I had was actually back in the WinNT days.
I do still use the letters "MCP" now and again, but I guess I am really doing so illegally.
The thing is, when I go for interviews for new jobs the paper qualifications get you nowwhere (well they wont get you that far if the company who is hiring are worth their salt).
My experience and references count for a hell of a lot more than a few paper qualifications that as others have said "those with no real-world skills can gain".
It is just a matter of cramming as much information into your head at the last minute and away you go.
My solution for all this:
I would love the exams to actually cost more to take.
Now I know that doesn't sound fair, but it will maybe stop a few people just getting these papers without having the skills.
Secondly, the exam should take longer and it should be a "simulation" rather than a series of questions.
Exam room is a workstation and a few servers in a domain with AD etc.
Examiners monitor you as they "break" things that make up the most common faults.
During the exam they also throw some of the less common faults at you and watch your method when it comes to troubleshooting and finding the problem.
The whole exam would be similar to say a driving test where your actual skills are put to work rather than how much you can remember.
More hassle?
Yes
More expensive?
Yes
End result, less people with the qualifications and they actually mean something to the industry at the end of the day.