Best firewall/antivirus/antispyware combo - 09/08/06 04:14 AM
If you don't care to read my story, but wish to add to the thread, this is a thread for those that decided against going with one company for an entire security suite, and instead have picked seperate firewall/antivirus/antispyware combos. Also, please list how it's affecting system performance, as part of my choice was to minimize system slowdown. Before paying for two of the programs, I tried the trial versions to see how system performance would be affected. I've paid for one, now, and will pay for the other a day or so before the trial is over.
My selection was ZoneAlarm AntiSpyware (with spyware disabled, purely for the firewall at a lesser price), NOD32 antivirus, and SpySweeper version 4.5.
Now, my story for those interested...
After getting fed up with Norton Internet security bogging my system down, so much so that I reinstalled windows, I've done a lot of review reading about various security products. Here's my opinion, though far from expert, from my readings.
The all in one suites all disappointed in one way or another. Norton/McAffee were well rated, but resource hogs. ZoneAlarm appears to have the best rated firewall, but it's antivirus and antispyware are lacking. There's always a catch.
So, I decided to just get one firewall, one antivirus, and one antispyware. Priority being on security without a significant hit to system performance.
The antispyware I'd already had. Webroot had me sold on SpySweeper the second it discovered a nasty bit of spyware that was on my system, that I was suspicious I'd might have had. They sold me the second it discovered it, because I'd tried a couple other antispyware software trials, that didn't detect it. And git this: I googled info about the spyware: it was comercially available. So, the other companies were to incompitant to search for commercial spyware, to cheap to purchase it, to inept to figure how to detect it, or in on it. None of these options did I care much for. Unfortunately SpySweeper's latest version (5.0) Would actually temporarily make all my windows inactive and I couldn't even click on anything without the default error beep every couple of minutes lasting a few seconds. Uninstalling it and installing 4.5 solved this, and It still can download the latest definintions, I just decline the version upgrade.
Spy Sweeper continues to be top rated amongst the review sites i've visited, though I think it's "SpyDoctor" that has snuck up and ranks about even to SpySweepers former solo best ranking.
For Firewall, I have ZoneAlarm AntiSpyware with the antispyware disabled so that it doesn't interfere with SpySweeper, or slow it down. This was to save money from purchasing Zone Alarm Pro, which doesn't have much more to offer exept price.
For Antivirus, I dug and dug. This is the most up for debate, but I went with NOD32. From what I've read it seems to be a sleeper. Perhaps because you can't buy it in a box in stores, so the reviewers don't review it much? From what I've read, though, it has a reputable history and reputable protection. Also a light footprint, system performance wise.
I must say that I'm much happier now with these three in combination than my former Norton Internet Security 2005. My system runs much faster, firefox doesn't take MINUTES to load after signing in. And I feel that the price, while a bit higher than a security suite, isn't much higher. Especially for what, AFAICT, is great protection with a minimal performance hit.
If I wish to play a game, and don't want popups from my firewall, zonealarm had a game mode, where I can chose to accept or deny any prompt that should come up during game mode (I select deny). This is a very nice feature when I'm gaming and already have my game configured to work online, or simply am playing single player.
All things said, so far I'm very happy with my selection. NOD32 lists programs it cannot scan that are locked, which worried me at first, but after reading some info, it appears that these programs aren't scannable or changable by any anitivirus, it's just that other antiviruses don't give you these details.
Feel free to comment about my decision, question it, correct me if I said something inaccurate, etc. Just thought this would be a good place to sound off on such a topic, with the vast knowledge bank that I've been able to tap here before. Unless I read several, extremely favorable reviews about a suite including low system performance expense, I think I'll remain doing the 3 seperate program deal I'm doing now.
My selection was ZoneAlarm AntiSpyware (with spyware disabled, purely for the firewall at a lesser price), NOD32 antivirus, and SpySweeper version 4.5.
Now, my story for those interested...
After getting fed up with Norton Internet security bogging my system down, so much so that I reinstalled windows, I've done a lot of review reading about various security products. Here's my opinion, though far from expert, from my readings.
The all in one suites all disappointed in one way or another. Norton/McAffee were well rated, but resource hogs. ZoneAlarm appears to have the best rated firewall, but it's antivirus and antispyware are lacking. There's always a catch.
So, I decided to just get one firewall, one antivirus, and one antispyware. Priority being on security without a significant hit to system performance.
The antispyware I'd already had. Webroot had me sold on SpySweeper the second it discovered a nasty bit of spyware that was on my system, that I was suspicious I'd might have had. They sold me the second it discovered it, because I'd tried a couple other antispyware software trials, that didn't detect it. And git this: I googled info about the spyware: it was comercially available. So, the other companies were to incompitant to search for commercial spyware, to cheap to purchase it, to inept to figure how to detect it, or in on it. None of these options did I care much for. Unfortunately SpySweeper's latest version (5.0) Would actually temporarily make all my windows inactive and I couldn't even click on anything without the default error beep every couple of minutes lasting a few seconds. Uninstalling it and installing 4.5 solved this, and It still can download the latest definintions, I just decline the version upgrade.
Spy Sweeper continues to be top rated amongst the review sites i've visited, though I think it's "SpyDoctor" that has snuck up and ranks about even to SpySweepers former solo best ranking.
For Firewall, I have ZoneAlarm AntiSpyware with the antispyware disabled so that it doesn't interfere with SpySweeper, or slow it down. This was to save money from purchasing Zone Alarm Pro, which doesn't have much more to offer exept price.
For Antivirus, I dug and dug. This is the most up for debate, but I went with NOD32. From what I've read it seems to be a sleeper. Perhaps because you can't buy it in a box in stores, so the reviewers don't review it much? From what I've read, though, it has a reputable history and reputable protection. Also a light footprint, system performance wise.
I must say that I'm much happier now with these three in combination than my former Norton Internet Security 2005. My system runs much faster, firefox doesn't take MINUTES to load after signing in. And I feel that the price, while a bit higher than a security suite, isn't much higher. Especially for what, AFAICT, is great protection with a minimal performance hit.
If I wish to play a game, and don't want popups from my firewall, zonealarm had a game mode, where I can chose to accept or deny any prompt that should come up during game mode (I select deny). This is a very nice feature when I'm gaming and already have my game configured to work online, or simply am playing single player.
All things said, so far I'm very happy with my selection. NOD32 lists programs it cannot scan that are locked, which worried me at first, but after reading some info, it appears that these programs aren't scannable or changable by any anitivirus, it's just that other antiviruses don't give you these details.
Feel free to comment about my decision, question it, correct me if I said something inaccurate, etc. Just thought this would be a good place to sound off on such a topic, with the vast knowledge bank that I've been able to tap here before. Unless I read several, extremely favorable reviews about a suite including low system performance expense, I think I'll remain doing the 3 seperate program deal I'm doing now.