Ethernet NIC cards ... which one?
#1
Posted 20 April 2000 - 10:33 AM
Can somebody explain what makes the difference between a 15$ NIC and a 100 or 200$ one?
On the paper most of them look the same and often are built around the same chipset.
Apart from the brand premium and bureaucracy overhead costs at large corporations HQs, what does justify the price gap?
Would a professionnal experimented in installing networks give some insight?
What does guide his choice from a technical/operational point of view?
Nic cards are so common these days that I wonder if anybody still cares about this component.
Thanks alot for giving advice on that subject which will help me setting up a new home network.
#2
Posted 20 April 2000 - 10:43 AM
otherwise it's mostly the same stuff.. maybe better quality?.. better support.. nothing much for home user.. oh yeah it matters if ur using Linux/Unix.. they're not as good as windows when it comes to taking peices of hardware
------------------
Volitaire
A+, MCSE, MCP+I, ACT
#3
Posted 20 April 2000 - 02:52 PM
I want the home network I am planning to be as reliable and safe as possible, with a solid Internet sharing connection.
In fact three PCs (one of them the laptop I use for homework, thus the need for safety) attached to a hub behind a fourth one acting as a server and as a firewall between my ADSL connection and the Internet.
In your opinion would it be worth spending some extra bucks for a pair of branded medium- to high-end Nic cards at least in this fourth PC which would be the most critical and loaded component in this system?
#4
Posted 20 April 2000 - 03:36 PM
The 3coms also seem to be faster than the Realtek 10/100 Mbit cards I used to have.
#5
Posted 20 April 2000 - 04:34 PM
#6
Posted 20 April 2000 - 04:41 PM
I suspect some of these cheap Realtek no-name Nics of giving you no more than basic service and reliability.
I have already noticed random and unexplainable packet losses that seemed to disappear with borrowed Hewlett Packard (damn expensive ones!)cards.
As I may have rather heavy traffic on some occasions at both sides of the server/firewall, for example two simultaneous on-line Q3A games or MP3 downloads, I cannot afford to give too many packets away.
#7
Posted 20 April 2000 - 04:48 PM
it will be an all Win2k setup except for the NT laptop.
I agree there is a lot of hype attached to some brands. But is this enough to explain one order of magnitude price gap?
#8
Posted 20 April 2000 - 05:53 PM
#9
Posted 20 April 2000 - 05:57 PM
#10
Posted 21 April 2000 - 02:58 PM
work fine for a couple of hours and the bugs out
turn off and let cool - fine again until 30 mins etc.....
#11
Posted 21 April 2000 - 03:27 PM
#12
Posted 24 April 2000 - 10:05 AM
I finally got one of those HP J2585b nic cards from my company's IT guy for a couple of beers
I'll follow your recommendations guys for the other cards in my network and send to the bin this noname-nowhere Realtek crap and get some cheap and good stuff from Aopen.
Thx all of you.
Take care.
#13
Posted 26 April 2000 - 02:35 AM
home network setup out there. 2 NIC cards-4port hub-2-25' connectors------69.00
you cant beat that!!!!
Have several schools running all NetGear and
all sorts of old to new OS- it all works!!!
Ned
#14
Posted 26 April 2000 - 04:12 PM
BTW, I have heard that the Linksys line has been pretty good lately. But I haven't heard anything new on Kingston and the Realteks always suck.
------------------
Regards,
clutch
#15
Posted 26 April 2000 - 04:20 PM
What protocols are you using? If you are beating the hell out of the NIC with wasted broadcasts that will overheat it (like my previous example). Also, is it close to a large heat source (like a V3 or GeForce)? I usually keep the NIC at the lowest available PCI since I don't use ISA parts.
------------------
Regards,
clutch
#16
Posted 28 April 2000 - 09:57 AM
#18
Posted 29 April 2000 - 03:23 AM
#19
Posted 29 April 2000 - 06:07 AM
------------------
Regards,
clutch
#20
Posted 29 April 2000 - 11:07 AM

Help










