Poll: Why do you use Win2k?
#1
Posted 02 February 2001 - 01:27 AM
------------------
Celeron II 566@952 on a Abit BH6 Rev 1.01, 192 Pc100, Matrox G450 32 DH,
SBlive Value, Supra Express 56i ISA, Win98SE
#2
Posted 02 February 2001 - 01:38 AM
------------------
"Being married to a programmer is like owning a cat. You talk to it but you're never really sure it hears you, much less comprehends what you say." -DeadCats, 1999
"Talking to DeadCats is like talking to a dead cat." -MrsDeadCats, 2001
#3
Posted 02 February 2001 - 02:48 AM
Multitasking
Customizability (think i made that one up)
It looks cool
It has way more features
It uses my 512 megs of ram alot better
NTFS
Security
reliability.
I don't have to reinstal it as often (The only times that I have had to reinstal win 2k
were because i wanted to repartition my hard drives or change hard drives)
Once you boot it up it gets faster as u use it not slower
No more illegal operations
I reboot when i want to.
It doesn't suck
------------------
My System
Dell Demension XPS T500
Triple Boot
Windows 2000 Pro 2195
Windows Whistler Pro 2296
Windows Millennium Final Retail
PIII @ 500 Mhz (with after market heatsink and dual fan)
512 Megs Ram
Guillemot Maxi Gammer Cougar (TNT2 M64 w/ 32 Megs of RAM)
Matrox Millennium PCI (w/ 4 Megs of RAM for second monitor)
3Com Etherlink XL 10/100 Ethernet Card
Abit Hot Rod Pro ATA-100 RAID Controler
2 x 12.6 Gig Maxtor Hard Disks RAID 0 (for system)
1 76.3 Gig Maxtor Hard Disk (for storage)
40X LG CD Rom Drive
100 Mb Iomega Internal Zip Drive
MS Explorer Mouse
MS Natural Keyboard Pro
And not a single peice of software that I actually own
#6
Posted 02 February 2001 - 06:45 PM
#7
Posted 02 February 2001 - 07:13 PM
As for why I use Win2k - what Four and Twenty said (altho you should invest in partition magic 6 man as it solves all that fdisking to resize hard disk stuff :-)
Cheers,
Kaiser
My System:
DELL XPS T550 (PIII @ 550 Mhz)
320MB PC-100 SDRAM DIMMs
9&12GB Maxtor IDE Hard Drives
Toshiba 6x DVD-ROM
Sony CRX-100E CD-RW
Trust 10/100 Ethernet NIC
Hauppage WinTV Go! Card
CL SBLive Value
CL 32MB GeForce DDR
Win2K Pro (with SP1)
[This message has been edited by Kaiser (edited 02 February 2001).]
#10
Posted 02 February 2001 - 09:37 PM
However NTFS records a lot more file information than FAT32 so technically it's likely to be a bit slower.
If you're running a standalone machine, then either system will do.
In a networked environment, NTFS is much better choice.
#11
Posted 02 February 2001 - 10:05 PM
#13
Posted 02 February 2001 - 11:15 PM
[This message has been edited by PsychoSword (edited 02 February 2001).]
#15
Posted 03 February 2001 - 02:13 AM
#17
Posted 03 February 2001 - 07:34 AM
// Toby
#18
Posted 03 February 2001 - 03:38 PM
2. nt platform is more configurable to the software that needs to be run. (the downside is configuring is not as easy)
3. the system is lean, because it doesnt have the modules written for automatic install and system setup like home systems i hate os's that ask too many questions.
4. the HAL is a more efficient way of managing hardware than a home os. (again sometimes a pain in the butt to deal with)
5. nt systems use system memory better than home systems. making it more stable and faster. if u have the resorces i always recommend home users learn nt.
6. security. absolutely cant beat it with a home system. if u have children (i dont) they have thier own login. parents can truly lock them out of certain things, with very little chance of bypassing security. a good nt user doesnt need a port sniffer or a firewall (non server users only). filesharing can be disabled and ports can be closed. online work should be done in a user, rather than a admin mode. a virus has to be written specifically for nt to infect critical systems.
7. i hate rebooting!! i can do a powerpoint presentation, play quake for an hour, switch to combat flight sim for an hour, then let my girlfriend log on and do a spreadsheet...all with no reboots. i just turn it off at the end of the day. 98 users cant boast that.
8. speed!!! wintune tests on 98 were about 1/2 that of nt4.0 ('cept for d3d because nt4.0 is opengl only) my cached disk tests went from 190mb/s to 290. and memory from 1100 (or so) to 1300mb/s.
then i put w2k on it and geez. cached disk jumped to 310+ and memory to 1660. processor speeds also jumped.
what can i say... nt is a mans os
#19
Posted 04 February 2001 - 07:41 PM

Help










