Dear all,
What is the best File Fat System to use on Win2k? and is the converting of drives to NTFS easy?
Thanks
Robert Culver
United Kingdom
Page 1 of 1
NTFS or FAT 32? - Which is best?
#4
Posted 03 July 2000 - 02:41 PM
Thanks for your advice - although If I want to format my drive again under NTFS, what do I do? (Still us a win98 boot floopy disk with the format command?)
Thanks
Robert
Thanks
Robert
#5
Posted 03 July 2000 - 07:32 PM
Format the drive using the 98 boot disk to the default fat32. When you install Win2k it gives you the option after it copies all the install files to convert to NTFS.
Someone said that NTFS is slower than Fat32 to me it seems to be the opposite actualy.
Someone said that NTFS is slower than Fat32 to me it seems to be the opposite actualy.
#6
Posted 04 July 2000 - 12:15 AM
NTFS is native to NT as its file system. NTFS is also more secure and will allow compression. NTFS is also more stable than FAT. Only drawback is that if you boot to DOS using a boot disk you can't read your drives.
#7
Posted 04 July 2000 - 01:17 AM
If you insert your Windows 2000 disc and boot off of it you can format your driver using NTFS or FAT32.
You can read your drives with a Dos boot disk but you need a third party utility.
You can read your drives with a Dos boot disk but you need a third party utility.
#8
Posted 13 July 2000 - 03:01 AM
i too was under the impression that NTFS was faster than FAT32, try looking for some hard-drive reviews that do both NTFS and FAT32 tests, i think you'll find NTFS comes out on top
#9
Posted 18 July 2000 - 06:24 AM
Here u go, it's a familiar topic around here...
http://www.ntcompatible.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/000024-3.html

------------------
Regards,
clutch
http://www.ntcompatible.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/000024-3.html
------------------
Regards,
clutch
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help










