Celeron 300a@464 on a Abit BH6 Rev 1.01, 192 Pc100, Matrox G400 32 SH, SBlive Value, Supra Express 56i ISA, all running on Win2k pro with other odds and ends
Will Win2k Gameplay always be slower?
#1
Posted 06 June 2000 - 05:19 PM
Celeron 300a@464 on a Abit BH6 Rev 1.01, 192 Pc100, Matrox G400 32 SH, SBlive Value, Supra Express 56i ISA, all running on Win2k pro with other odds and ends
#3
Posted 06 June 2000 - 11:01 PM
coppermine 733
Asus P3B-F
Geforce DDR 256 5.22 98&2k
#4
Posted 07 June 2000 - 05:50 AM
#5
Posted 07 June 2000 - 02:40 PM
The only game I haven't been able to play has been half-life. Pretty much everything else I'm interested in plays, and plays better than it ever did in any version of win 9.x
I don't bother with benchmarking since I stopped o/c'ing. Its no big deal to lose a bit of framerate, when the games no longer crash, don't jitter or lag (well Messiah shouldn't count because it was broken in any OS), and generally run smooth as butter.
This isn't with a balls to the wall system either, just a middle of the road one. Granted I do have a lot of memory, and even when I insist memory is one of the most important pieces of hardware on message boards, people tend to scoff at the idea. Then again, those people seem to be the one's with the most problems :-)
Case in point, I was playing Motocross Madness 2 in 1920x1440x16 the other day with about 15-17fps. Almost playable and this was with a TNT2 Ultra. How many people with win9.x can do the same thing?
Its a personal preference, but to me Win2k is the best OS for everything I do with a computer.
#6
Posted 07 June 2000 - 03:11 PM
------------------
Written on:
PII 300
Aopen AX6B
160mb RAM
i740 8mb
20gb Seagate
6gb WDCaviar
Using 100% Australian Made recyclable electrons
#7
Posted 07 June 2000 - 10:23 PM
What are your Half-Life symptoms?
I can install it fine, but the moment the game attempts to run after entering the keycode i simply get an "Explorer generating errors" message.
Strange thing is, both the Half-Life UpLink and Opposing Force demos run great. The full game just doesn't want to know at all.
No problems with Thief or Thief 2, so I guess i'll survive for now.
#8
Posted 07 June 2000 - 11:54 PM
#9
Posted 10 June 2000 - 04:14 AM
I don't need the tweaked half-life .inf, because I run my desktop in 16 bit.
I also tried using the half-life game update and spent most of one day d/loading the latest patch(10 days ago), only to try and unpack the update and got crc errors.
I want to play the game again, and try counterstrike, so I will use up one more night and download the latest update from the fastest mirror I can find.
#10
Posted 10 June 2000 - 05:04 PM
I downloaded the 1.1 patch last night. The one that will upgrade any version of half-life.
I reinstalled half-life this morning. Bit of problem there. Auto-run generated errors. I had to reboot, open explorer and run setup.exe from the cd manually. It gave an error message about some "current control set + vxd + more microsoftincompatibility16bitbull****:-)". Just click on ignore and the game will install.
Don't try running the game yet. Go to the downloaded patch and install it first. Then run the game and it should be ok.
I tried playing in d3d at 1280x960, but it was very jerky. I also couldn't save properly, because when I hit "esc" to get to the save menu, all I got was a black screen. Hit "esc" to get back to the game, "alt-tab" to minimize and use task manager to shut down the game.
I restarted the game, changed video to 1024x768 in "default" Open GL and it worked great. You can now use the "esc" key to access the save/load/quit/etc. menu.
Have to say after 2 years, the game still makes the hairs on the back of my neck still stand up.
Hope this helps you people out.
PIII550
Viper 770 TNT2 Ultra with 5.22 drivers
Aureal 8830 reference drivers
Lots of ram, hd giggage, big frigging monitor
Counterstrike here I come.
Good luck all.
#11
Posted 10 June 2000 - 07:58 PM
#12
Posted 11 June 2000 - 09:25 AM
#13
Posted 12 June 2000 - 03:30 AM
I was thinking about investigating here, but I dont think its worth it. 50 fps is great, too.
I didnot have any probs with half-life, yet (three weeks..). I started out with 1.0.1.6 and I never encounetered errors (other than that the server I was formerly playing on host randomly kicked users...).
------------------
My system specs:
PIII 600E @ 800, SBLive, 15 GB IBM, Gigabyte BX2000, WinTV, Pioneer DVD, Iiyama VM Pro 451 (1280x1024@100Hz
#14
Posted 13 June 2000 - 01:21 AM
This is not consistant so I haven't a clue what it could be. I have an Asus Geforce DDR and these problems did not occur when I had the 3.xx drivers (any of them, even Asus) but now it happens with 3.xx and 5.xx drivers! I tried a new BIOS for my system, and it locked up before and after the new hl patch. I really don't want to go back to win98 to play games this summer, but I might just have to (Every other game works just peachy).
I also cannot get AGP 2x to work in 2000 without locking, but I could easily in Win98!
Athlon 550 on GA-7IX
128MB PC-100 RAM
Asus Geforce256 DDR with ref 5.22 drivers
Diamond MX300 with ref 2500.49 beta drivers
Windows 2000 Pro
------------------
- Andrew
#15
Posted 13 June 2000 - 04:28 AM
These are the specs I'm running.
C533
192MB RAM
10.2GB HDD
Viper 550
SB Live value
#16
Posted 13 June 2000 - 06:20 PM
[This message has been edited by Wolf (edited 13 June 2000).]
[This message has been edited by Wolf (edited 13 June 2000).]
#17
Posted 13 June 2000 - 07:58 PM

Help










