Compatible Support Forums: Guys How well would this system run Win2k pro?

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Guys How well would this system run Win2k pro?

#1 User is offline   pr-man 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1030
  • Joined: 19-February 00

Posted 29 January 2001 - 08:28 AM

Guys how would this system run win2k pro? Would the slow HD really kick my *** ?

Celery 2 566@ 952mhz
192 megs pc100
Abit BE6 rev 1
Western Digital 8.4 UDMA-33 5400 RPM HD
Matrox G450 32 meg DH
SB live Value
Supra Express 56i ISA
and many other things.
0

#2 User is offline   EddiE314 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1778
  • Joined: 18-January 00

Posted 29 January 2001 - 09:12 AM

it would run it very nicely.
0

#3 User is offline   pr-man 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1030
  • Joined: 19-February 00

Posted 29 January 2001 - 06:53 PM

Is 192 megs really enough ram wise?
0

#4 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 29 January 2001 - 07:30 PM

256MB is really smooth, while 128MB can be kind of a dog. Personally, I just ordered another 512MB from Crucial for my server. By the time I am done I should have 384MB in my main workstation and 640MB in my Win2K AS box.

------------------
Regards,

clutch
0

#5 User is offline   JimmyK 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 18-July 99

Posted 30 January 2001 - 03:38 AM

hey bud, yeah throw some win2k action on that, heck if u make it an NTFS partition u might even get better performance, and u know ur gonna get much better security and reliability with a NTFS partition, but yeah u might wanna think about upping that ram to a minimum of 256. BUT 192 will do VERY nicely.
0

#6 User is offline   whoisurdaddy 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 11-July 00

Posted 30 January 2001 - 08:28 AM

pr-man, Win2k should run pretty well on your system. For RAM, 192mb is pretty good but I agree with Clutch and JimmyK on adding more RAM. Win2k run faster with more RAM. I am additional 128mb on my computer. I just bought 128 mb of PC-133 from Crucial for $61 after tax.
0

#7 User is offline   EddiE314 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1778
  • Joined: 18-January 00

Posted 30 January 2001 - 10:31 AM

i'm running 640mb here, honestly i didn't notice a difference in speed other than games loading maps and photoshop after i upgraded from 384mb to 640mb, you'll notice a big difference going from 64 to 128 to 192 to 256.
0

#8 User is offline   Brian Frank 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3088
  • Joined: 21-January 01

Posted 31 January 2001 - 03:18 AM

Should be okay, I'd definately bump up the RAM to 256 or even 384. Plus the RAM you need is dirt cheap anyway.
0

#9 User is offline   Four and Twenty 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1623
  • Joined: 25-March 00

Posted 31 January 2001 - 05:45 PM

definatly get as much ram as you can afford. I noticed a big diff going from 256 to 512.
0

#10 User is offline   paul_h_amiga 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44
  • Joined: 29-November 00

Posted 31 January 2001 - 06:59 PM

Isn't that overkill? I mean I have 192MB of Ram in my system, but 640?? Please explain any reason for having that much (unless you are running SQL or some other thing...)

------------------
Bob The Builder

http://www.thtproductions.co.uk/
0

#11 User is offline   Son_Gohan 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: 30-December 00

Posted 31 January 2001 - 07:16 PM

Maybe for:

1-loading HUGE images, resizing them, appliying filters with photoshop

2-FOr emulators

3-For large SOUNDFonts (I've seen a 256 MB sf2 somewhere).

4-3D gfx cards using AGP port will benefit from extra memory for textures.

5-For Fun

6-Huge databases

7-RAMDRIVE. IT's great when you set your temp folder to a Ramdisk of 128 MB.

(But, actually, My system works fine with "only" 128 MB)

[This message has been edited by Son_Gohan (edited 31 January 2001).]
0

#12 User is offline   Four and Twenty 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1623
  • Joined: 25-March 00

Posted 31 January 2001 - 07:23 PM

um what is wrong with overkill
i plan to put another 256 meg dimm in my pc when i can afford it.
0

#13 User is offline   PsychoSword 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 204
  • Joined: 19-November 00

Posted 02 February 2001 - 11:34 PM

I'm going to ditch my two generic pc-100 64 meggers for a couple of pc-133 256 meg dimms. Heck they can be had on price watch for as low as $65 a piece. Can't beat a deal like that. smile
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users