Compatible Support Forums: Win2k server

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Win2k server

#1 User is offline   @~@:~KEV~:@~@ 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 27-August 00

Posted 03 September 2000 - 05:13 PM

Ok i want to know if win2k server will run on the following system. Im running nt4 on it and it really like to upgrade:

AMD K6 233
64Meg Ram
1.7 Gig Hard Disk
Really Crap ATI Graphics Card (256kb or summat)

Id like to get win2k on there and if i can ill use it as a dedicated lan server. I think the main problem will be the RAM but all i want to know is WILL IT INSTALL AND RUN? if its slow i dont care.

Thanks

Kev
0

#2 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 03 September 2000 - 06:04 PM

Yes, it will. Processor is fine but you really REALLY need some more memory. Windows 2000 AS without any of the services for server loaded takes up 58m all by it's little self.
0

#3 User is offline   [Ff]Raider 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 03-September 00

Posted 03 September 2000 - 07:32 PM

Dude add like 128 megs more ram and at least 3 more gigz of space. I have a 2k server up with a celery 333@500 with 220 megs and 13.6 7200rpm and a 20gig 5400rpm drive. That is acceptable but not as fast as I would like it. It eats that memory up. Its my mp3/web/exchange/coutner strike server. remote controlled by pc anywhere.

It was a dog with 96 megs. I made it 220 and now its alot smoother. I still have only 40megs of ram left after everything and it gets worse depending on the web and mail traffic.

so... more ram more hd space.

good luck
0

#4 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 03 September 2000 - 07:43 PM

Yeah, I had an MSDN version of Win2K AS running on my server (which was a cel 333 with 128MB RAM, 1 6GB drive and 3 4.3GB drives striped in software "RAID5"--striped with parity) and it was a complete dog. If it crashed and rebooted, it would take forever to reboot because it would verify the stripe set (NT didn't do this), and that would take about 45min on its own. I want to go for the Win2K MCSE since I have a freebie test comin to me from my NT4 MCSE cert, but I am afraid that I don't have enough box to run it now. I upgraded to 192MB of RAM and I have a cel 300 o/ced to 450, so I may try again. I have SMS 2.0, SQL 7.0, MDaemon 3, 6 websites and 2 FTP sites running on it (most of the sites are for testing with one "live" site) along with other misc. services. I don't think that Win2K AS will hang with all that on this box like NT can.

------------------
Regards,

clutch
0

#5 User is offline   @~@:~KEV~:@~@ 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 27-August 00

Posted 04 September 2000 - 09:46 PM

so will it run?
Ive heard that server wont install unless youve got 128Mb of RAM.
Also its not advanced server, just server.

ta
0

#6 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 05 September 2000 - 05:19 PM

Server will not install unless you have 64m. But you can bypass that by editing a file. wink laugh
0

#7 User is offline   @~@:~KEV~:@~@ 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 27-August 00

Posted 05 September 2000 - 09:40 PM

right ta thats ok - all i need it to do is serve files and act as a proxy for the net so im sure it will be fine with 64 (untill i get more money) no worries - the damned thing doesn't even have a monitor smile
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users