Jump to content
Compatible Support Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Memn0

Upgrading from Tiger 100 to Tiger 133... Is it absolutely n

Recommended Posts

Just like the title says, I'm upgrading from Tiger 100 to Tiger 133 and I was wondering if it would be absolutely necessary to format and reinstall Win2k or if I could just do like a repair type thing upon installation. Or can I just put it in turn it on and let 2k figure out the rest. The board should be here tomorrow so I'm really eager to find out before it gets here. You know how hard it is to avoid installing new hardware when you first get it.

 

Jason Vail

Share this post


Link to post

If you just re-run setup, the setup program will only change the registry settings that it sees as wrong. IE the hardware settings.

 

You could try uninstalling all your hardware from device manager (after making a backup) then doing the swap, so when the PC restarts it has to redetect everything, it works in win9x, sometimes in NT4, but who knows with NT5. I'd give it a shot smile

 

There is usually never a good reason for a re-format, unless the filesystem is acting up. I had a problem a while back where the setup would crash at the very end of registering components with a fastfat.sys error, thats the sort that warrants a reformat, as the last resort.

 

However do note that I havent figured out how you re-import your user profiles properly. If you do, tell me! Win2000 tends to make new copies with the Computer name as an extension IE Administrator.YOURCOMPUTER-WIN2000 frown but most data can be copied into the new profile name like favourites, cookies, start menus etc.

Share this post


Link to post

You should be ok with a simple swap and let Win2k take care of everything 4 u. In most cases it will work fine. Only if there are some diferences that WIn2k can't find will u need to re-install.

Back your stuff up just in-case and just do a swap. If your system will be having some wired IRQ problem then re-install will most likly solve it.

Win2k in general is much better with HW swaps then 95/95 and can usualy handle it without problems.

Share this post


Link to post

There's a knowlegebase article at support.microsoft.com that talks about how to do this. Its called "Moving Windows 2000 to new hardware or something like that." Most people get the dreaded Boot Device Inaccessible message when they try to just let Windows 2000 handle it.

Share this post


Link to post

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×