Intel PRO/DSL 2100 Modem Drivers
#1
Posted 25 April 2000 - 08:59 PM
#2
Posted 07 May 2000 - 06:21 PM
#3
Posted 11 May 2000 - 09:40 PM
hmmmmm.
#4
Posted 12 May 2000 - 05:44 PM
just my .002
#5
Posted 15 May 2000 - 11:00 PM
#6
Posted 16 May 2000 - 05:26 PM
To clerify, I work for MegaLAN, the network oriented devision that configures the 675. There are 10 people on my team as opposed to the 60 or so that are on at any given time for megabit, which handles the Cisco 605, 675, and Intel 2100. A few things I want to point out, since it doesnt seem to be clear to some people:
#1. Internet connection sharing. When I worked on Megabit a while back, I used to get calls from people trying to network the 605 or the 2100 through ICS. I still get those, when they somehow stumble into my que after being told that MegaLAN support them. Each and every person that Ive ever talked to had reported that ICS with the 2100 or 605 has completely hosed windows. They had to do a full Fdisk, Format and Reinstall. The reason for this is really very simple. *Youre not installing a Modem.* The 605 and 2100 are *Routers* and they dont dial up, the dont operate in an even remotely similar way to an analog modem, and ICS wasnt designed for a Router. Its modemville, baby. Hope this helps get rid of some of the conspiracy theories Ive heard way to often.
#2. We here at tech support have been told consistantly that the 2100 would have win2k drivers publicly available on the 8th of this month on the uswest website. As you might notice, its currently the 16th, and still no drivers. I received word *5 minutes ago* that Intel has waffled, and they are not, as was previouslly indicated, doing a public beta test. They are conducting a *private* beta test. This bites for us as well as you, because not only have we been telling the customers that call that the drivers would be available over a week ago, but now we have to get back on the phones and explain to generally ticked off people that we wernt lying to them, We were told by intel that we would have drivers and now they changed their minds.
Intel has NOW told us that the public drivers will be out sometime in August. We're not happy about it either.
http://www.ntcompatible.com/ubb/Forum3/HTML/002427.html
#7
Posted 16 May 2000 - 07:33 PM
You can count the fear of exsessive bandwith consumption out of the list as well.
Personally I find it amusing that people want a free 675 because of the drivers for the 2100. This would be similar to buying a ford with the express knowledge that the ford doesnt have power windows and there are no garantees it ever will. After a few months, you take it back and express extreme dissatisfaction with Ford because it doesnt give you the option to upgrade to power windows. In fact, you think youre entitled to a Dodge ram for your troubles, at the cost of the Ford dealership. I cant believe it when I hear my cubemates tell me how they just talked to someone who was completely rude, demanding a product that costs $200 more then their router because they were too cheap to buy the 675 in the first place, and now they changed their minds.
Last note: Cisco hasnt committed to doing a driver for the 605 at all.
Greybear
#8
Posted 16 May 2000 - 07:43 PM
#9
Posted 16 May 2000 - 09:19 PM
Greybear
#10
Posted 18 May 2000 - 08:09 PM
my .02
#11
Posted 18 May 2000 - 08:27 PM
#12
Posted 19 May 2000 - 03:59 AM
As for the Car analogy, Again, if thats what happened to you, it sucks. I can only say that there are people who are working to change all of this, and high officials who know exactly how badly it bites to be a jilted customer, because techs keep reminding them. It will get better, for whats its worth.
Greybear
#13
Posted 22 June 2000 - 04:48 AM
peace

Help










