[News]

Hi all,

We have just published a three-way SSD group test, featuring G.Skill's
128GB SSD, Intel's X25-M 80GB and the Patriot Warp V2 128GB drive - if
you could post a link on your site that would be very much appreciated.

*Link:*
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2008/12/03/g-skill-patriot-and-intel-ssd-test/1


*Picture:*
http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2008/12/g-skill-patriot-and-intel-ssd-test/fp_img.jpg


*Quote:*/
And that, in essence, is where the SSD rests today - as an expensive
extravagance limited only to the most ludicrously high end PCs. While
the Intel X25-M breaks the mould and proves SSDs can deliver not only
phenomenally fast read, but also decent write performance, its price tag
is sure to put all but the most opulent hardware enthusiast off.

Sadly the same can't be said for J-Micron based drives like the Patriot
Warp v2 and G.Skill 128GB. While they deliver on the promise of
significantly increased read speeds, the compromise on write speed makes
them useless for all but the most specialist setups. While the price is
a whole lot cheaper than the Intel, if you're looking to switch your
boot drive over to an SSD you might as well not bother - the issues
around drive stuttering and read/write performance in Vista 64-bit just
make them more of a headache than a help, although they remain an option
if you're considering a dedicated game install drive.

So where does this leave the SSD as a storage option? A long way from
replacing mechanical drives is where. While Intel has unequivocally
proven that the technology has legs and can perform, the price of such
delights still sits far from the hands of mere mortals. While we've no
doubt that SSD drive speeds will improve, capacities will increase and
prices will drop in time, right now the SSD remains a desirable but
expensive option that only the most wealthy should consider. /*

*Cheers guys!

Tim Smalley
www.bit-tech.net