[News]

Hi all,

We have just published a review of *Call of Duty: World at War*. If you
could post a link on your site that would be very much appreciated.

*Link:*
http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/2008/11/15/call-of-duty-world-at-war/1


*Picture:*
http://images.bit-tech.net/content_images/2008/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war/fp_img.jpg


*Quote:
*/World at War isn't a bad game, it just isn't a very remarkable one
despite bearing the //Call of Duty moniker. Again, //World at War has
fallen victim to the Treyarch curse, but it's also got the double whammy
of being set in the Pacific theatre. Decent co-op and multiplayer are
blessings, but they can't counteract the curses completely.

This is a game that'll appeal to teenage fanboys a lot too -- that's
what the quote-unquote adult material is there for, right? That's why
there's a zombie Nazi mode too. These aren't bad things and we don't
hate them, we just can't bring ourselves to love them either and //World
at War certainly isn't going to hold our attention enough to get a
second playthrough. There are far better games on the horizon, some of
which also have zombies, and Treyarch has left us only with the feeling
that we've seen this done a hundred times before -- and done better./
*

*Cheers guys!

Tim Smalley
www.bit-tech.net