Page 1 of 1
Want "WICKED-FAST" Disks? Check it...
#3
Posted 25 November 2004 - 04:43 AM
So APK, are you thinking about creating one of these yourself, the other post seemed to indicate this to me 
I would much rather pay you then somebody else that's for sure
I would much rather pay you then somebody else that's for sure
#4
Posted 25 November 2004 - 06:40 AM
My issue is that I really can't see spending about $300 on a caching app/driver no matter what it did for me.
I really think they need to produce a desktop edition for the end user and optimize it for gaming
I can tell you that many of us hard core gamers would like to get better performance out of our rigs but not at that kind of cash
I would really like to see how this app runs on standard 7200 SATA drives in a RAID Zero array
I really think they need to produce a desktop edition for the end user and optimize it for gaming
I can tell you that many of us hard core gamers would like to get better performance out of our rigs but not at that kind of cash
I would really like to see how this app runs on standard 7200 SATA drives in a RAID Zero array
#5
Posted 07 December 2004 - 11:29 PM
@ apk
i got curious about tweaking my 2000 system.harddisk performance is very important for things like video-or audio editing what i'm doing most of my free time.
so i don't know.what's the disadvantage of such programs like supercache except the need for lots of ram.as i understood these kind of programs are made for server systems but thinking of them as high performance systems, maybe it neither would be wrong for my editing purposes at my little workstation, although i should get some extra ram and a second harddisk first.
you see that i'm spending a lot of time here atm, but it's just too interesting...
phil
p.s. you mentioned that you used WinTune97 for the benchmark test, so i guess you ran it on another Win9x networked-system during test, no ? i'm asking because i never did that and i don't know anything about the best procedure for doing it.
i got curious about tweaking my 2000 system.harddisk performance is very important for things like video-or audio editing what i'm doing most of my free time.
so i don't know.what's the disadvantage of such programs like supercache except the need for lots of ram.as i understood these kind of programs are made for server systems but thinking of them as high performance systems, maybe it neither would be wrong for my editing purposes at my little workstation, although i should get some extra ram and a second harddisk first.
you see that i'm spending a lot of time here atm, but it's just too interesting...
phil
p.s. you mentioned that you used WinTune97 for the benchmark test, so i guess you ran it on another Win9x networked-system during test, no ? i'm asking because i never did that and i don't know anything about the best procedure for doing it.
#6
Posted 08 December 2004 - 12:32 AM
im gonna stick with scsi and scsi raid's until
we get past this whole magnetic media thingy
yay solid state hard drives!
we get past this whole magnetic media thingy
yay solid state hard drives!
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help










