Compatible Support Forums: Fedora Core 2 vs. SuSE 9.1 FTP Install | What do you think?

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fedora Core 2 vs. SuSE 9.1 FTP Install | What do you think?

#1 User is offline   macawgumbo 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 30-December 03

Posted 21 July 2004 - 04:09 AM

I have a choice to make. For reasons not explained here, I have narrowed my linux distro search to two distributions, Redhat Fedora Core 2 and SuSE 9.1 FTP Install. I absolutely love SuSE's YAST2 tool. It makes configuration so much easier. I also like the fact that I can easily choose a mirror for updates instead of like in Fedora having to use Redhat's dog slow servers. I am only concerned about the fact of package selection in SuSE compared to Fedora. I will need to use this computer as a Windows replacement (full productivity, surfing, music, cd burning, gaming etc.) along with Apache to do some PHP/MySQL development. Which would be faster on an nForce2 platform? Any thoughts would be great.
0

#2 User is offline   martouf 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 338
  • Joined: 09-July 04

Posted 21 July 2004 - 04:46 AM

There are Fedora mirrors and I'm certain you can adjust your Fedora config to use them.

As for the distro choice, I think you're observing a cylindrical clear silica liquid container
filled to half capacity.

In other words: 6 of a set of 12 or a half-dozen, your choice.
"Faster" should not be a consideration, much less a Real World issue.



0

#3 User is offline   macawgumbo 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 30-December 03

Posted 21 July 2004 - 05:01 AM

Let's put it this way, I love SuSE, but don't want to skimp on the availability of programs. Is the FTP Install the same as personal or in between Personal and Pro. By the way, I tried Gentoo and got headaches. I loved the learning experience but the curve was too steep. ALSA wouldnt work right so I gave up. Shame on me. Oh well. For now I want a packaged distro like redhat and suse. ANyways can someone give me some more advantages of Suse?
0

#4 User is offline   Dapper Dan 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1703
  • Joined: 27-September 03

Posted 21 July 2004 - 05:20 AM

I've never used Suse, although a friend of mine is going to let me borrow his boxed copy of 9.0 in a day or two. I hope I'm pleasantly surprised!

I can tell you about Fedora though. If you like Yast, you would likely also like apt-get rpm for Fedora. I think it works pretty much the same way, and I've not experienced any problems downloading packages nor with updating my system with apt-get.

I like Fedora precisely for the reasons you mention. If you're not in a hurry, I can get back with you on my thoughts about Suse after I've had time to smoke it over.
0

#5 User is offline   martouf 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 338
  • Joined: 09-July 04

Posted 21 July 2004 - 06:22 AM

I don't think you need to worry about package availability because both Red Hat
and SuSE serve practically identical audiences - only one is to the west of the Atlantic
and the other to the east, respectively.

I say this as a RHCE who uses SuSE at home.


0

#6 User is offline   macawgumbo 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 30-December 03

Posted 21 July 2004 - 04:23 PM

I have had an oppurtunity to use Fedora and SuSE before. I would say Fedora is is very much similar to SuSE, the only difference being the YAST2 tool. I love it. I can configure everything during setup and rerun it at anytime to reconfigure things. I think that you will appreciate the YAST2 tool, Dapper Dan. Let me know what you think. As for now, I will do an FTP install of SuSE 9.1 and stick with it. Please feel free to continue to post though. Include other distros if you want.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users