Jump to content


Photo

Intel 3.06Ghz 800Mhz FSB HyperThreaded CPU: Good read!


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 03:37 PM

Only thing I am missing is the 800FSB CPU

Got Dual WD Raptors and Corsair ram, now I need that 2.4c to come out

#2 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 09:15 PM

My WD 120SE scored around 29000 on sandra, and my dual raptors score 69000, and average sustained rate of 97mb

Quite nice

#3 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 10:11 AM

Send me the program to test it with.


sapiens74@hotmail.com

#4 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 11:11 AM

Wish I'd have know, I would have recoded it.

I love that robot.

#5 Champion_R

Champion_R

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 266 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 01:49 PM

Quote:
My WD 120SE scored around 29000 on sandra, and my dual raptors score 69000, and average sustained rate of 97mb


What kind of RAID controller are you running? I was under the impression there was a serious lack of decent SATA controllers. I was only aware of the Silicon Image and Intel's onboard one were true SATA controllers.

#6 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 02:59 PM

The onchip INtel Raid on the Abit IC7, 875p chipset

#7 Champion_R

Champion_R

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 266 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 05:44 PM

Pitty one can't get that on a PCI card :P

#8 Ali

Ali

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 318 posts

Posted 19 May 2003 - 11:44 PM

These guys who tested this system don't seem to be very accurate. the frequency is NOT 3.06 GHz, but it is 3.00GHz. I hope they didn't do the same while they were running the tests! laugh

that is not the only BIG thing that intel is not going to change for few months. Intel Centrino Mobile tech. is working really good. we have started selling them at work and they are Niiiiicceeee, with two thumbs up. in fact i like them much MUCH better than p4-M's. My coworker liked them so much that he bought one right away.

#9 Mr.Guvernment

Mr.Guvernment

    veteran

  • Validating
  • 1441 posts
  • LocationCosta Rica

Posted 19 May 2003 - 11:53 PM

P4's over clock incredibly - i mean 2.4 - 3.1 woith sotck voltage and a cheap fan.

from oen person i know has the 3.0c they got it to 3.6 easily off the bat.

#10 Ali

Ali

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 318 posts

Posted 20 May 2003 - 12:19 AM

[quote="AlecStaar"
I did a bit of reading on those the last few weeks someplace online, I believe it was ZDNet...

(Better power consumption & cooler running, correct?)

smile

APK[/quote]

A LOT better cooling, and a LOT SMALLER battery that will last about the same ammount of time as the big ones. it also runs at 1.6GHz. i have thested the 1.3 Ghz one though but it feels like working on a 2.4 Ghz Desktop. it has ATI r. 9000 Mobile, and a SXGA screen. (1280x1024 native resolution) and bluetooth, wireless lan, intel pro nic.

even at Ultra Low power mode (600Mhz) it still runs very well. with windows XP it doesn't feel like 600 Mhz at all, everything works just fine.
i thing it is because if the 1MB cache on the CPU. these ones make other laptobs look like a joke. especially the ones with p4's.

this is what going to be hot for next few months for sure.

#11 Ali

Ali

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 318 posts

Posted 21 May 2003 - 10:50 PM

Never deared to open it up and look at the CPU. I don't think it is a socket 370 CPU (doesn't look like it, the laptop is way too small and thin for a socket 370, it just won't fit, unless they come up with a crazy design)

It is only for laptops, Centrino is not the name of the CPU. it is the combinition of the CPU, motherboard chipset and the onboard lan, wireless lan, and the BlueTooth. if any of that is missing intel will not let the manufacturer put the Centrino logo on it.

#12 Mr.Guvernment

Mr.Guvernment

    veteran

  • Validating
  • 1441 posts
  • LocationCosta Rica

Posted 25 May 2003 - 08:56 PM

the P4 Nothwood chips C1 stepping take the cake

they are saying this new p4 2.4c could be the next "magic chip" people have also been hitting the 3.4g mark easily with these chips - week 9 and 10 i beleive.

#13 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 25 May 2003 - 11:36 PM

I got my 2.6c setup.

Here's my rig



http://home.hawaii.rr.com/sapiens74/

Got it to 3.34 GHZ so far at 257FSB

#14 Champion_R

Champion_R

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 266 posts

Posted 26 May 2003 - 10:16 AM

Wouldn't the 2 Raptors on top of each other overheat? IMHO you are better off putting one in the lower drive bays.

#15 bobbinbrisco

bobbinbrisco

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 366 posts

Posted 02 June 2003 - 02:04 PM

does the P4 2.66GHz processor contain hyper threading technology?? when does Intel start adding HT technology into its processors?

#16 BladeRunner

BladeRunner

    veteran

  • Members
  • 1208 posts

Posted 02 June 2003 - 02:19 PM

The following CPU's have Hyperthreading enabled:

Northwood B (533Mhz) 3.06Ghz
All Northwood C (800Mhz)

All Northwood B CPU's have had HT built in, however this is disabled at the factory and cannot be enabled, despite what some sites have said.

#17 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 02 June 2003 - 06:12 PM

Quote:
Wouldn't the 2 Raptors on top of each other overheat? IMHO you are better off putting one in the lower drive bays.


So far they work fine together.


Problem is the lower bay has a fan, and the drives stick out too much

#18 jdulmage

jdulmage

    veteran

  • Members
  • 1203 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 05:21 AM

As to not start a war or anything..

the specs in my signature (I haven't bothered changing them yet) show an AMD Barton 3000+ system, only after a month did I ditch it and am now awaiting my Intel setup.

I thus far have received the OCZ Dual Channel RAM, the Zalman 7000 HSF and the P4P800 board...waiting for the processor, 2.8 "C" P4 (great! lol).

After just fooling with the P4P800 board itself, I will NEVER go back to AMD again. I mean, the i865PE chipset on the p4p800 is ready for Prescott (so i'm prepared for Intel's next chip design), and thanks to Asus, you can enable the so called "only in i875 chipsets" PAT feature, which is now 100% available on i865PE chipsets called HyperPath or "Memory Performance Mode"

double the FSB, 700 Mhz more clock, and HyperThreading and now HyperPath technology....no thanks AMD, I'm staying with Intel.

#19 sapiens74

sapiens74

    Pooh-Bah

  • Members
  • 1915 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 07:16 AM

I really like my setup and it was reasonable on cost

#20 Ali

Ali

    enthusiast

  • Members
  • 318 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 06:07 PM

we have just recieved Intel D865PERL mobo and we can not get it to post.
we have tried 400/533/800 fbs cpu's on it and tried it with all kinds of memory configs (ddr 266/333/400/ tried single and dual) but no post. all of our VGA cards are AGP4x though.
anybody has got this mobo working?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

IPB Skin By Virteq