Compatible Support Forums: What software do you use for Mp3/Wav playback?

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What software do you use for Mp3/Wav playback?

#1 User is offline   Lotus 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 286
  • Joined: 17-July 01

Posted 21 April 2003 - 10:56 PM

I currently use Winamp3 but I'm looking for another choice. What do you use?
0

#2 User is offline   ViolentGreen 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 557
  • Joined: 28-March 03

Posted 21 April 2003 - 11:07 PM

Quote:
I currently use Winamp3 but I'm looking for another choice. What do you use?


Theres a new winamp 2.9x (dont remember exact version) that's excellent. I have heard they are going to completely ditch winamp3 and go on to the next version (winamp6?) since winamp3 failed on so many levels.
0

#3 User is offline   DS3Circuit 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 739
  • Joined: 11-December 02

Posted 21 April 2003 - 11:33 PM

http://sonique.lycos.com/
0

#4 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 22 April 2003 - 12:23 AM

2+3=5
Although...

2.9+3=5.9 Could be ver 6. Hmmmm....

Either way 5 or 6, there'll be only one Winamp!
0

#5 User is offline   nebulus 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 214
  • Joined: 05-October 02

Posted 22 April 2003 - 05:37 AM

xmms smile
0

#6 User is offline   ViolentGreen 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 557
  • Joined: 28-March 03

Posted 22 April 2003 - 05:44 AM

Quote:
xmms smile

xmms = winamp wannabem but why the hell can't you use winamp skins?

I like winamp better though.
0

#7 User is offline   ThC 129 

  • veteran
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1578
  • Joined: 06-December 99

Posted 22 April 2003 - 07:30 PM

anyone that doesnt use Winamp 2.xx is retarded... well thats my opinion. laugh Winamp 2.xx is the MOST HIGHLY support audio playback application on this planet. I mean you could always go with the WM9 series, and having used WMP 9 its not that bad but its still an MS product.

I like Winamp 3 because of a few of the playlist features (multiple playlists, enqueue without moving the tracks around) and free form skinning. There are some really cool winamp3 skins out there.

So i use 2.9 and Winamp3 smile
0

#8 User is offline   duhmez 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 583
  • Joined: 27-April 02

Posted 22 April 2003 - 10:51 PM

Winamp 2.x for mp3 becauese winamp 3 broke all the 2.x plugins...

WMP 6.4 for wavs.
0

#9 User is offline   Mr.Guvernment 

  • veteran
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1441
  • Joined: 04-January 01

Posted 23 April 2003 - 04:38 PM

winamp3 - if they fixed the slow start up time it would not be bad - i just like the MMC skin for it smile
0

#10 User is offline   DS3Circuit 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 739
  • Joined: 11-December 02

Posted 23 April 2003 - 09:31 PM

Quote:
anyone that doesnt use Winamp 2.xx is retarded


:p

Well then lemme put on my dunce cap laugh laugh
0

#11 User is offline   Champion_R 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 25-October 01

Posted 24 April 2003 - 09:04 AM

Quote:
anyone that doesnt use Winamp 2.xx is retarded

I've found that out of all the MP3 players Winamp 2.x has by far the worst audio quality. It also has low CPU usage but the quatity is shocking. For WMAs and MP3s I use WMP9. Easily the best sound quality but it does use more resources than Winamp. On top of that WMP9 has great playlist features and media organising features.

WinAmp 3 has better audio quality than 2.x but it takes forever to load and the interface is so slow (even on modern systems). WMP 6.4 is still a very good player in terms of sound quality but it lacks playlist features.

P.S. I do like the like the fact Winamp 2.x can play a locked file (good for trying files that are being downloaded :P)
0

#12 User is offline   nebulus 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 214
  • Joined: 05-October 02

Posted 26 April 2003 - 12:48 AM

Quote:
xmms = winamp wannabem but why the hell can't you use winamp skins?

I like winamp better though.

I don't know about you, but I got all my (and I mean MY smile ) winamp skins working with xmms.. without any throuble..
0

#13 User is offline   shassouneh 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 672
  • Joined: 01-July 01

Posted 27 April 2003 - 04:00 AM

Quote:

xmms = winamp wannabem but why the hell can't you use winamp skins?

I like winamp better though.


Choking.. au hem, excuse me? Winamp skins not working on Xmms? are you sure you meant what you just said? nebulus is absolutely right. Never had a single problem with Winamp skins on Xmms, or do you mean Winamp 3 skins? I think Winamp 3 sux to begin with, let laone the winamp 3 skins!!!

I use xmms 90% of the time (when running Linux) and Winamp 2.8.x whenever in Windows.
0

#14 User is offline   shassouneh 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 672
  • Joined: 01-July 01

Posted 27 April 2003 - 04:03 AM

Quote:

Theres a new winamp 2.9x (dont remember exact version) that's excellent. I have heard they are going to completely ditch winamp3 and go on to the next version (winamp6?) since winamp3 failed on so many levels.


Really? I think that would be wise, and I do agree, Winamp 3 did not deliver what it promised and crashed waaaaay too often frown
0

#15 User is offline   ViolentGreen 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 557
  • Joined: 28-March 03

Posted 27 April 2003 - 08:57 PM

Quote:
Quote:

xmms = winamp wannabem but why the hell can't you use winamp skins?

I like winamp better though.


Choking.. au hem, excuse me? Winamp skins not working on Xmms? are you sure you meant what you just said? nebulus is absolutely right. Never had a single problem with Winamp skins on Xmms, or do you mean Winamp 3 skins? I think Winamp 3 sux to begin with, let laone the winamp 3 skins!!!

I use xmms 90% of the time (when running Linux) and Winamp 2.8.x whenever in Windows.


Hmmm... The version that I last used was several years old. At that time, I could find nobody that could do it. I guess that is fixed by now. Good to hear. I put a newer distro on my system a few months ago but havn't had too much time to mess with it. Not sure if I even set up the sound now that I think about it.
0

#16 User is offline   terryx 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 04-October 02

Posted 27 April 2003 - 10:12 PM

I use MMJ... but the latest version has a huge footprint, 25 megs. Thats alot for playing MP3's and whatever. I paid for the premium version of musicmatch, so I use it even with the memory hogging.
0

#17 Guest__*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 29 April 2003 - 06:39 PM

i use winamp 2.9x, as winamp 3.0 need more resources.

winamp 3.0 has nice interface, but after starting a song, who looks on its interface ?? me no... i keep it playing hidden in taskbar.

WMP 9.0 has nice interface, but same problem as winamp 3.0, much resources and interface not needed always... ;(
0

#18 User is offline   ViolentGreen 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 557
  • Joined: 28-March 03

Posted 29 April 2003 - 07:06 PM

Quote:
I use MMJ... but the latest version has a huge footprint, 25 megs. Thats alot for playing MP3's and whatever. I paid for the premium version of musicmatch, so I use it even with the memory hogging.


I despise it. I use it for ripping and but no playing. I do use it for syncing up my ipod though. It has a habit of chopping off letters at the end of mp3 tags. Hopefully when I finally get the new version downloaded, this won't be an issue. I just have to go though my 2000 mp3s and replace the ones with bad tags. As I said, I despise it. I do like the "tag from filename" feature enough to keep it on my system. I had a command line app I wrote for that but it wasn't as full featured. I am planning on creating another one when I get some free time.
0

#19 User is offline   adamvjackson 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2174
  • Joined: 26-August 02

Posted 30 April 2003 - 01:01 AM

Quote:
I despise it. I use it for ripping and but no playing. I do use it for syncing up my ipod though. It has a habit of chopping off letters at the end of mp3 tags. Hopefully when I finally get the new version downloaded, this won't be an issue. I just have to go though my 2000 mp3s and replace the ones with bad tags. As I said, I despise it. I do like the "tag from filename" feature enough to keep it on my system. I had a command line app I wrote for that but it wasn't as full featured. I am planning on creating another one when I get some free time.


I've been there, I know it's a pain. I used Tag&Rename to recreate the ID3 tags automatically though. You might want to look into that.
0

#20 User is offline   ViolentGreen 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 557
  • Joined: 28-March 03

Posted 30 April 2003 - 05:18 AM

Quote:
Quote:
I despise it. I use it for ripping and but no playing. I do use it for syncing up my ipod though. It has a habit of chopping off letters at the end of mp3 tags. Hopefully when I finally get the new version downloaded, this won't be an issue. I just have to go though my 2000 mp3s and replace the ones with bad tags. As I said, I despise it. I do like the "tag from filename" feature enough to keep it on my system. I had a command line app I wrote for that but it wasn't as full featured. I am planning on creating another one when I get some free time.


I've been there, I know it's a pain. I used Tag&Rename to recreate the ID3 tags automatically though. You might want to look into that.


Will do. Musicmatch also has that feature where you can select a group of files and it will try to pull up tag info based on filenames and partial tags. That is also pretty cool.
0

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users