Compatible Support Forums: win 2k3 clustering /routing

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

win 2k3 clustering /routing

#1 User is offline   Four and Twenty 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1623
  • Joined: 25-March 00

Posted 22 March 2003 - 01:18 AM

i have two servers that are both running win2k3 enterprise edition

i would like to cluster them together so that i have a failover.

i don't really use them for storage i use them for spliting up the cable modem to the network. I want to figure a way that if one crashes or dies i don't have to unplug anything a switch it around cause the net has to stay up all the time. Especially when i am not here.

anythougts?
0

#2 User is offline   AndyFair 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 748
  • Joined: 21-May 01

Posted 22 March 2003 - 08:09 PM

Luckily I went to an MS seminar on Friday discussing (amongst other things) Windows 2003 Server - and one of the things mentioned was clustering and server consolidation.

2003 clustering is more advanced than before, in that it is now possible to setup 2-into-1 and N-into-1 clusters, as opposed to the relatively simple 1-into-1 clustering which has been available until now (although I may have understood that bit wrongly!)

Take a look here for more info on 2003 clustering.

Hope this helps,
Rgds
AndyF
0

#3 User is offline   DS3Circuit 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 739
  • Joined: 11-December 02

Posted 24 March 2003 - 02:19 AM

Besides exchange 2000, I have yet to experience a need for such crucial uptime to warrant clustering.

As long as you have the proper hardware to setup and run cluster services, I cannt see a reason why RRAS would be an issue for that setup. An active/cluster should be adequate for your needs.
0

#4 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 24 March 2003 - 08:46 AM

Quote:
Besides exchange 2000, I have yet to experience a need for such crucial uptime to warrant clustering.

As long as you have the proper hardware to setup and run cluster services, I cannt see a reason why RRAS would be an issue for that setup. An active/cluster should be adequate for your needs.


SQL and IIS could be other reasons ;), but if you are serving from home then chances are your home broadband connection will die before your hardware will. No amount of clustering will protect you from a failed connection.
0

#5 User is offline   DS3Circuit 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 739
  • Joined: 11-December 02

Posted 24 March 2003 - 04:55 PM

Quote:
SQL and IIS could be other reasons


In our educational environment, upper management does not see a need for 100% uptime on Web services .... and well with SQL ... budget constraints should suffice it wink

Quote:
then chances are your home broadband connection will die before your hardware will. No amount of clustering will protect you from a failed connection


Anybody wanna donate to the "DS3circuit cluster services at home" fund? laugh
0

#6 User is offline   Four and Twenty 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1623
  • Joined: 25-March 00

Posted 24 March 2003 - 10:51 PM

i am not trying to serve out to the net i am trying to serve the net to the office

i know how to set up a cluster but what i don't know is how to plug my cable modem into both machines. I don't want a nat router in front of the machines casue that is what the machines do.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users