Compatible Support Forums: Little utility for sysadmins using NTBackup

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Little utility for sysadmins using NTBackup

#1 User is offline   Vermyn 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 156
  • Joined: 30-November 99

Posted 09 March 2003 - 09:20 PM

For those of you who use NTBackup and need to set up a scheduled task and don't feel like reading through the cryptic and often conflicting documentation, I've created a .NET application that will create a scheduled task for you that runs NTBackup.

You can get it here:

http://www.red-abstract.com/users/alexander/software/default.htm

Hope you enjoy it... .NET runtimes are required!

--Alexander
0

#2 User is offline   duhmez 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 583
  • Joined: 27-April 02

Posted 12 March 2003 - 02:20 AM

I will giot on my personal pc and let you know what I think.
0

#3 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 12 March 2003 - 09:10 AM

Yup, me too. The first thing I noted was that this package sure is big for such a simple function.....Must be .NET. laugh
0

#4 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 12 March 2003 - 06:59 PM

Ah, it's the .MSI Installer's that are eating up the space. Actuall program is very small. smile
0

#5 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 12 March 2003 - 07:17 PM

Yeah, but MSI files are much nicer to uninstall if using regkeys and screwball dlls, and can be more easily deployed using AD.
0

#6 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 12 March 2003 - 09:28 PM

I am referring to the general use of batch files, EXEs, and MSI files being used as installers. I like using scripts in Linux to install applications and such since you can go through it and know what is being done and how to get rid of everything (apps are based off of existing libraries the vast majority of the time and nobody tries to modify important ones to support their app). But, with system files and registry mods the MSI installer has been great. I have had far more success with application installations, and the ones that have had issues can be repaired easily (another MSI trait) or just removed much cleaner.
0

#7 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 12 March 2003 - 09:40 PM

.MSI's are easy to edit although not as easy to understand as a script or a .BAT. I use the Wise Installer from Installshield to troubleshoot my .MSI's.

I still haven't quite got the hand of creating .MSI's tho. Need to sit down and play around with it.
0

#8 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 12 March 2003 - 10:02 PM

APK, have you tried creating and using MSIs? You might like what you see, as using batch files in a windows environment isn't nearly as powerful nor consistent. You might be able to do more with a VB script, but if you can do that you might as well just step up to MSI files and get all the benefits. I have used installation designers from McAfee and MS that let me install applications with all the defaults I choose (including the serial number, installation location, and other options) whereas I wouldn't have had all the control via a batch file. Also, you can automate many features of MSI-based installations via commandline parameters, and this method allows for temporary elevation of privies for the installation (and can also be locked down to keep non-admins from installing things). Batch files would be too cumbersome, or downright incapable of doing these things. I would suggest trying it before comparing the two directly.
0

#9 User is offline   Vermyn 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 156
  • Joined: 30-November 99

Posted 13 March 2003 - 05:21 AM

Hey gang...

Nice to see no one is bashing the app too hard har har har

Probably the only feature I will add at this point is the ability to choose the scheduled task time/date... aside from that, it's pretty cut and dry - not much else to do with it unless you folks think of something!

--Alexander
0

#10 User is offline   Vermyn 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 156
  • Joined: 30-November 99

Posted 13 March 2003 - 06:43 AM

I do the network admin job too... senior engineer actually, and have to live with the pain of watching other admins suffer when they don't "have time" to read ntbackup's docs...

Hence this was born!

--Alexander
0

#11 User is offline   danf 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 26-September 04

Posted 26 September 2004 - 09:21 AM

Looks like it moved...

http://www.red-abstract.com/software/win32/utils/NTBackup_Scripter_v0.2.zip

http://blogs.galaxycow.com/vermyndax/
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users