Compatible Support Forums: We Stand Passively Mute by US Senator Robert Byrd (cleared)

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

We Stand Passively Mute by US Senator Robert Byrd (cleared)

#1 User is offline   felix 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 691
  • Joined: 28-October 99

Posted 19 February 2003 - 05:37 AM

Removed.
0

#2 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 19 February 2003 - 07:21 AM

Felix, why are you so hung up on the possibility of war with Iraq, and posting anything you find that only deals with the US on this forum? From what I have read, at *least* the UK is siding with us along with another ally (and no, I can't think of it right now) and yet you seem hell-bent on singling the US out for everything. At this time, I interpret this as basically "trolling" for arguments on this topic, and would ask you to stop. Also, I would ask that others who are reading this topic and find it offensive/annoying to *NOT* get into an argument about it here. I am coming to the conclusion that while this is the "Other" forum, religion and politics are still two things that should be left out of it.
0

#3 User is offline   sapiens74 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1915
  • Joined: 30-March 00

Posted 19 February 2003 - 07:55 AM

Go pick up a copy of C@C Generals. look for sapiens74

We can have war there :P
0

#4 User is offline   adamvjackson 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2174
  • Joined: 26-August 02

Posted 19 February 2003 - 08:48 AM

Quote:
I am coming to the conclusion that while this is the "Other" forum, religion and politics are still two things that should be left out of it.


I think that is a very wise decesion.
0

#5 User is offline   felix 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 691
  • Joined: 28-October 99

Posted 19 February 2003 - 01:31 PM

Fine.

As for the C@C, I'm still on a 56k and don't generally have time after work. Maybe when I move into my new place.

However I might consider Age of Empires II: Conquerors. smile
0

#6 User is offline   adamvjackson 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2174
  • Joined: 26-August 02

Posted 19 February 2003 - 02:01 PM

Nothing personal, Felix, but I have seen many discussions quicky go downhill when those topics are brought up.
0

#7 User is offline   felix 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 691
  • Joined: 28-October 99

Posted 20 February 2003 - 12:29 AM

I wouldn't go that far.
I also stuck the boot into jdulmage during "that" incident, but later felt bad about it and apologised.

As for my opinion, after a long talk with a friend of mine in NY (her brother is also a Naval Aviator and she's a Politics/History grad) I have realised that some parts of my argument/belief are too idealistic and perhaps too passive to be feasable.

I guess if we (and I say we becuase it is a world issue) were dealing with a stable, predictable authority figure, continued diplomacy would be an option. After my little chat, where I learnt some facts I didn't know about previous engagements, I must change my stance away from "No War" to something different, though I'm not sure quite what.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users