Need advice purchasing CPU/Motherboard setup!
#2
Posted 18 November 2002 - 12:46 AM
#3
Posted 18 November 2002 - 12:49 AM
#4
Posted 18 November 2002 - 12:53 AM
they are very nice machines
#6
Posted 18 November 2002 - 01:05 AM
#8
Posted 18 November 2002 - 03:00 AM
You see I'm currently dividing up my computer into the functions that fit best, instead of fitting file/server, video, work, gaming into one computer.
I am finally getting around to building my file server and then have a dedicated gaming computer.
The gaming computer will have an Athlon XP 2800+, Asus N78X Nforce mobo, Radeon 9700, 1GB of Ram, DVD, 1gb NIC, and probably 1-2 HD's.
The server will be my Abit VP6 Dual P3-1ghz@1105mhz (until I decided on what I want to replace it with), GF4 TI4600, 1GB RAM, 2x 48x CDRs, 1gb NIC and all of my HD's in a RAID-5 Array. (Hopelly SATA 120GB disks)
I will also be using my server as an actual server. Loading applications and such straight off the server such as work files so that I will not lose any work by saving it on my gaming computer...so basically my gaming computer will be pretty much straight gaming.
You say that you are thinking about getting an Athlon MP...but for what? Are you EXACTLY aware of what SMP can and can not do for you? For the P4: Are you aware of what Hyperthreading can and can not do for you? I would say that if you are not going to use these functions then you should not buy them because there is really no point in buying them if you not going to use them.
Here's a good article from Ace's on hyperthreading: http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=50000319
If your looking at a P4 then I suggest you study the price/performance ration between a P4/AMD and decide if it's worth it to you. Looking at the amount of computers you have I would think that it would not be worth it but I am not aware of how often you upgrade.
Basically if you upgrade alot then it's Athlon
If you don't then it's P4.
#9
Posted 18 November 2002 - 03:39 AM
Won't break the bank either.
If not, wait for Granite Bay, which should be out soon
#10
Posted 18 November 2002 - 09:17 PM
#11
Posted 18 November 2002 - 09:31 PM
#12
Posted 18 November 2002 - 09:45 PM
How is the chipset performance between both systems? How is hardware compatibility? What about memory controller performance? Also, does it support any future hardware upgrades you might be looking for (SATA, USB 2.0, etc) out of the box without giving up PCI slots? Has there been any further development for dual AMD cpus? You might find yourself trying to get the most out of 2 fast procs when the mobo can barely keep up with one.
#13
Posted 18 November 2002 - 09:56 PM
#14
Posted 19 November 2002 - 12:18 AM
Granite Bya has been officialy released today
Asus P4G8X Deluxe
Gigabyte GE-8INXP
There are 2 links for the mobo's, have a look at the gigabyte it is fantastic!
#15
Posted 19 November 2002 - 01:00 AM
#16
Posted 19 November 2002 - 06:14 AM
#17
Posted 19 November 2002 - 07:25 AM
The comp will be used for Gaming mainly and i am ordering a MSI GF4 Ti4600 and a sony 21" monitor next week so i am a heavy gamer really!
not many games support dual CPU's to my knowledge, you would be better getting a higher P4 chip, then dual AMD's.
unless u do also plan to do some 3d design and CAD - dual cpu's won't give u that much gain in games.
Iv heard some great things about Dual processor machines and toms hardwares benchmarks prove what they can do compared to single processor system
Dont' beleive everything you read - especially from toms hardware!
fromALL the reading i did about dual systems (as i was going to get one myself)- over all i think it was u get maybe a 20-33% increase in performance for apps that can actually USE dual cpu's set ups.
If you gaming - i do not know of alot of games that will actually use dual CPU power ???? and DDR 266?
AMD can now use DDR 400 can they not?
#18
Posted 19 November 2002 - 08:55 AM
At the desktop/gaming level the mobo technologies and peripheral hardware has a greater impact on desktop/gaming performance than dual processors does.
The new Nforce board's support Dual-Channel DDR-400 and the new P4 Granite Bay mobo's only support Dual-Channel DDR-266. Of course the P4's are up to 3ghz now and the Athlons are only up to 2.25? 2800+ghz. Still the 2800+ is the better buy as far as I'm concerned, better processing power, more efficient, less costly.
The P4 GB should still beat the Dual-Channel DDR-400 on the Athlon due to the P4's memory efficiency. Gonna have to check some benchies.
As far as which is better for gaming performance? Faster memory definetly has a greater impact than dual processor when gaming...but it really depends on what game your running or what your running in the background.
Of course when gaming only the game is running and with the newergame's sucking up more and more power forcing us to drop to lower and lower resolutions then I would have to say that faster memory would be a better buy than dual processors as far as gaming is concerned.
#20
Posted 19 November 2002 - 05:25 PM
The Athlon boards aren't very memory effecient, and they High end Athlons are as costly as thier P4 brethren, not to mention you have to buy a nice $40 cooler for the AMD.

Help










