Any good recent articles comparing win2k versus winxp?
#2
Posted 02 November 2002 - 07:02 AM
(a little fix on this post: there is this advantage of having MSCONFIG in XP which makes the life easier!!! )
#5
Posted 03 November 2002 - 05:47 AM
#7
Posted 04 November 2002 - 07:53 AM
#8
Posted 04 November 2002 - 08:32 AM
#9
Posted 04 November 2002 - 08:40 AM
now that we are done with XP lets talk about Lindows!!!! Sure sounds nice!!!
#11
Posted 04 November 2002 - 02:44 PM
Agreed. Any Linux distribution that encourages logging in as root is retarded.
#12
Posted 04 November 2002 - 09:04 PM
but the day I really have to pay for a copy of new OS is the day i'll be looking for something that works and is good enough to work with. Linux is a much cheaper solutionthan windows, and it looks noce too. but i am lazy to go and learn Unix!!! :p
if someday i have to pay to Mr. Gates, i have rather to consider all my alternatives first.
#13
Posted 04 November 2002 - 09:26 PM
#14
Posted 04 November 2002 - 11:35 PM
honestly only because i have better things t do with $300+ to pay for the OS. on the other hand, you pay the money and for the support you still have to pay another $270 when you need help from MS.
i may pay for an os that is really supported, and they don't ask me for my credit card number when i call them.
I work for a computer company and whatever i do is legal according to all oem standards. but still they won't proivide you with the support when you need them most. (sure if you pay for each question you ask they will treat you nicely, but each one is going to cost you or your company over $270US)
for my personal use i have not bought a single software from Microsoft in past 3 years and i never regret it. Because they dissapointed me when I payed for it.
Do you actully buy Windows even though you know if anything goes wrong your best bet are people in NTCompatible, not Microsoft?
#15
Posted 05 November 2002 - 01:14 AM
#17
Posted 05 November 2002 - 03:44 AM
1. Be aware of software licensing and reprocessions of compliance failure
2. The need to be familiar with the most common software
I would be lying if I said that I have never downloaded software which I was not entitled to do so, however, if I personally find the software to be useful, I will purchase a copy/license. Also, if the software does not meet my needs, it is removed immediately. This is a fine line that I walk, and I know that it is in the gray area, there's no denying that.
#18
Posted 05 November 2002 - 08:37 PM
i don't think there is anything wrong with buying windows, but i'm an idealist and a poerfectionist. if the person or company that i deal with (personally) doesn't treat his clients right, it is not going to have my business. on the other hand i said i don't pay for "Microsoft" software product because i know they don't care to give you support if there is no money involved for their goofups.
i have deal with Ulead, Ahead, Lavasoft, nad many others and everytime i contacted them i got a decent answer. Also i contacter Roxio and they never gave me the right answer and i won't use roxio products and if i have to use it i have rather not to pay for it.
same goes with MS. the day they support you on their goof ups then i pay for my OS. i have full licence for 98/ME/ and 2000 and ME was a disaster, 98 was a little better than ME and 2000 had problems with Video for windows and they never gave me a decent answer to my problem. XP so far is the best one as long as i don't have to deal with MS directly.
#19
Posted 05 November 2002 - 08:46 PM
For people who care to know how i got the licences, i got them from work. i payed for 98, and the company that i work with payed for ME and 2000.
#20
Posted 12 November 2002 - 04:49 PM
-Zeek

Help










