Compatible Support Forums: Does anyone have a better idea

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Does anyone have a better idea

#1 User is offline   bytemangler 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 27-February 01

Posted 17 September 2002 - 09:27 PM

I search the forum but I can't find related topic to this. Here's my test.
I created a user profile in Win2K server (user1). Profile path is root:\users\username. Home is \\root\home\username. My problem is with the home drive assignment. This setup let users see other users folders event though they can't access it. I want to assign drive x: to all users and it would be only their folder they are seeing. Which mean drive x: is everyone's home drive but different folder. I fix it but using the share with $ option and created a user's folder from the c:\username$. Ideally I don't want to have 20 or 30 user folders located on the root drive. I prefer them all located in HOME folder I have created.
Server is w2K
wks is NT 4 and win9X
Any idea?
0

#2 User is offline   Silver-Dagger 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 138
  • Joined: 07-April 02

Posted 18 September 2002 - 12:18 AM

OK in the users profile where you difine where the home directory is you will need to do something like this:
\\root\home\%username%
The %username% is a envirment varible that has the users name in it. This will work for NT, 2000, and XP. There is not way to do this in 9X that I know of.
0

#3 User is offline   bytemangler 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 27-February 01

Posted 18 September 2002 - 11:53 PM

My original setup turns out to be correct. The laptop I was testing on got win98. I install win2K and the the profile setting works fine. The drive mapping is good. There is some funky issue that appear when a user log on. The message is "..windows cannot created the profile directory \\server\users\username.pds...please contact network adminstrator"
I gave the user full admin access and still the message. What you guy make of it? I tried every configuration thinking it was a access level issue.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users