Post your UT 2003 benchmarks
#1
Posted 17 September 2002 - 04:01 AM
It seems that Benchmark.exe set's your UT2003.ini to defaults, so modifying it or changing your UT2003 settings will have no affect. (Still testing this)
Obviously running the batch files or until someone write's a better benchmark GUI would be preferable but running Benchmark.exe is the simplest solution for now.
UT 2003 Demo
D3D
BENCHMARK.EXE
640X480
Flyby: 152.320267
Botmatch: 49.975044
800x600
Flyby: 152.435501
Botmatch: 49.959011
1024X768
Flyby: 151.934494
Botmatch: 49.901531
1280X960
Flyby: 142.084518
Botmatch: 49.754349
1600X1200
Flyby: 86.616623
Botmatch: 46.055515
----------------------------------
1600X1200
16x Ansio
Flyby: 56.752377
Botmatch:38.702225
6x AA
Flyby: 47.968014
Botmatch: 24.337336
16x Ansio & 6x AA
Flyby: 37.581856
Botmatch: 20.769403
#2
Posted 17 September 2002 - 04:13 AM
They are all flyby's and spectator. ;( Who in the world decided that this would be a proper benchmark representive of gameplay? Obviously they created this "Benchmark" as a demo to showcase the Unreal engine on different graphics cards. I knew this before I benchmarked the game and fired it up because the gameplay absolutely sucked.
#3
Posted 17 September 2002 - 05:18 AM
So, since benchmark.exe is using the same .ini the only difference in major cause of problems with benchmarking with benchmark.exe is inability to adjust graphics options (unless you change the source .INI in this case MAXDETAIL.INI), according to the readme the difference in BOT battle (slower CPU=stupider AI?), inability of crappier graphics hardware to take advantage of options enabled in MAXDETAIL.INI.
So we need a Benchmark prog that can detect the host vid card.
Support all graphics options of said graphics card without having to tweak host video card settings. (Also the benchmark could automagically set the video card settings to default if necessary).
Automagically gray out unavailable options for crappy video cards.
BENCHMARK.EXE information
file..ut2003.exe..open....
1024x768
1600x1200
1280x960
640x480
800x600
dm-asbestos?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\botmatchexec.txt ini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetail.ini userini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetailUser.ini -nosound -UPT -
dm-antalus?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\botmatchexec.txt ini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetail.ini userini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetailUser.ini -nosound -UPT -
dm-asbestos?game=engine.gameinfo -benchmark -seconds=70 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\flybyexec.txt ini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetail.ini userini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetail.ini
User.ini -nosound -UPT -
dm-antalus?game=engine.gameinfo -benchmark -seconds=77 -exec=..\Benchmark\Stuff\flybyexec.txt ini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetail.ini
userini=..\Benchmark\Stuff\MaxDetailUser.ini -nosound -UPT -
Files explanation
botmatchexec.txt
showhud - Removes HUD information. Text etc.etc.
Ship - removes demo version text
flybyexec.txt
causeevent flyby - Some sort of scripted flyby sequence?
Ship - removes demo version text
MaxDetail.ini - Benchmark.exe uses these for the UT2003.ini to see benchmark information
MaxDetailUser.ini - Used to set control information for the benchmark?
#5
Posted 17 September 2002 - 07:10 AM
Your vid card suxs!
#6
Posted 17 September 2002 - 07:23 AM
50+ at 1024x768@32bit in botmatch
I don't use the other resolutions on this machine, so I didn't care about them.
#7
Posted 17 September 2002 - 03:40 PM
Flyby: 168.46
Botmatch: 57.41
I have a feeling ill be playing the original alot more than this though.
#8
Posted 17 September 2002 - 05:59 PM
Your vid card suxs!
it cost me a whopping $100
i am happy with it
i don't have time for games anyhow
i just use it for the dual head features
#9
Posted 17 September 2002 - 08:59 PM
#10
Posted 17 September 2002 - 09:14 PM
#11
Posted 18 September 2002 - 12:29 AM
1024x768x32bpp
Fly-by: 119.613496
Bot Match: 38.7012391
only res i have tried is 1024x768, don't really care about the rest, most people don't.
#12
Posted 18 September 2002 - 01:11 AM
I wouldnt even be 100% sure its faster than a Voodoo3
#13
Posted 18 September 2002 - 02:58 AM
#14
Posted 18 September 2002 - 03:31 AM
Personally, I'd give that award to the TNT2.
#16
Posted 18 September 2002 - 08:52 AM
#17
Posted 02 October 2002 - 01:36 AM
They have it on sale so im all giddy now

Help










