Compatible Support Forums: Geforce 4 mx 440

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Geforce 4 mx 440

#1 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 09 August 2002 - 05:32 PM

hey..
i just upgraded my geforce2 mx 400 to the geforce 4 mx 440.

i have 2 questions.

first i had a choise between a 64MB ddr card and a 128MB Sdr card and i chose the later.did i make the right choise ?

second....i need help here, i only get 1800 on 3dmark2001se
which is really low and ever lower than the score i used to get with my previous card (2700 ~).....why is that ???

Please Help....i upgraded to improve performance ...not to degrade tham...

Help !!!!

[Win XP ; 1.6Ghz pentium 4 ; 256MB]
frown
0

#2 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 10 August 2002 - 12:43 AM

Welll,

1. DDR is faster than SDRAM.
2. The GF4 is basically a GF2 with just a few added features.
3. You wasted your money.
4. Sorry.
5. frown
0

#3 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 10 August 2002 - 02:50 AM

are you saying i won't see any difference in performace ?? and if any ,it will be worse???
0

#4 User is offline   HELLBRINGER 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 468
  • Joined: 27-June 01

Posted 10 August 2002 - 02:16 PM

Well I think something may be screwed up. What, I don't know... But DosFreak is right... you wasted yer money. These cards are just a bit faster than the GF2MX, you shoulda got a GF3 Ti, or even a GF4 4200 or something, they are down to about $180 or so somewhere I saw.
0

#5 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 10 August 2002 - 05:47 PM

that's not exactly true.first i had the option to upgrade so i payed only the difference between the cards.

second ,there is a difference in gaming,for example S.O.F II used to stutter like hell if i chose "very high texture quality" (but ran smoothly on "high texture quality")and now it runs smoothly.ALien Vs predator did some problems if i set the settings on the best possible,and now i can feel it's better.

the only thing is the very low score i get with 3dmark...
0

#6 User is offline   tHêGhð§tÔfT¡mé 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 17-March 02

Posted 11 August 2002 - 12:56 PM

I currently got a prolink TNT 2 M64 32mb card...im looking at upgrading to something faster, i know a GF 4 mx 440 is only a Gf 2 on steriods with some new shit attached...but how much faster would it be over my dying TNT2???
0

#7 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 11 August 2002 - 03:52 PM

Take a look at this.

http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q2/020418/index.html

good run down of gfx cards smile
0

#8 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 11 August 2002 - 06:00 PM

Hey....should i will replace my card to the 64MB DDR ??

will it be faster than my current 128MB SDRAM ????...

cause i'm no near the results from tom's hardware....
0

#9 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 11 August 2002 - 06:45 PM

Best thing to do would be to get a ti4200, as it gives you excellent performance and features for the money.

Even a gf3 is better than a 4mx frown
0

#10 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 12 August 2002 - 01:49 AM

if i had the money sure.....but if i wanna be realistic i have 2 choices...a geforce 4 mx 440 with 64MB DDR or geforce 4 440 with 128 SDRAM...what is better ???
0

#11 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 12 August 2002 - 02:53 AM

Are you sure its SDR btw, i didnt know they made gf4mx cards with SDR memory frown

If it is sdr then the ddr one should be significantly faster, even with half the mem as that wouldnt really be a factor.
0

#12 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 12 August 2002 - 01:57 PM

i didnt know they made gf4mx cards with SDR memory either nor with 128MB of it,but it's really sdram.gainwad produces this kind of boards.when i went to buy the card the seller offered me the 128MB version of it, i noticed it was sdram but the seller told me it has the same performance,so i thought even better......ya right..

it appears that i can replace my card with the 64MB ddr version of it, so you would definitely recommend doing so??
0

#13 User is offline   tHêGhð§tÔfT¡mé 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 37
  • Joined: 17-March 02

Posted 12 August 2002 - 02:45 PM

DDR memory will always kick sdrams ass in any format weather its system ram or video ram smile so i recommend u get the DDR card
0

#14 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 12 August 2002 - 03:08 PM

Yeah if you can just do a straight swap out or something for the DDR card then it would definatly be worth doing.

I just cant beleve they would make a gf4 mx with SDR, i mean how low can nvidia go 8)
0

#15 User is offline   pmistry 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1047
  • Joined: 17-April 00

Posted 14 August 2002 - 03:14 AM

I don't think there are GF4MX 440 cards with SDR, however I am sure that the GF4MX 420 is SDR based.
0

#16 User is offline   Vulcan 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 123
  • Joined: 14-August 00

Posted 15 August 2002 - 11:59 PM

aaahhhh guys....apparently...DDR RULES !!!!!


i did as i said and replaced my card with a 64MB DDR (instead of my previous 128MB SDRAM ) and everything is fine....

3dmark201se shows 5206 and frame rates in all games are alot higher than before.....i guess the list of vga cards at tom's hardware doesn't lie.....!!!

so if someone has a card that scores way below that list ,than something is not right...


thak you all !!!
0

#17 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 16 August 2002 - 12:11 AM

Cool smile Glad to see its all working better smile
0

#18 User is offline   Brian Frank 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3088
  • Joined: 21-January 01

Posted 17 August 2002 - 10:56 AM

Never mind...didn't see a page 2 before I posted.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users