AVG antivirus.
#1
Posted 21 June 2002 - 12:51 AM
The reason that I ask is that I have successfully used it to clean numerous viruses, and have run it alongside McAfee to compliment the retail antivirus.
#2
Posted 21 June 2002 - 02:00 AM
Many people like McAfee. I don't. It buries itself throughout your registry. It conflicts with certain programs. In other words - too intrusive. It is the devil to uninstall.
Norton's has gotten better, but like its System Works, it overreaches. It too seems to intrude itself and there was a time when it was a real memory hog.
Just my opinion.
#3
Posted 21 June 2002 - 02:21 AM
Avoid Mcafee like the plague! We have a $60,000 site license for it at work, and it's on every machine (except the ones in my office, we have Norton and AVG
#4
Posted 21 June 2002 - 04:16 AM
#5
Posted 21 June 2002 - 04:48 PM
Anyway, I have seen problems with both Norton and McAfee, lately I have seen McAfee stalling machines (win9x)during bootup, chokes during the scan and dies.
You all use any other virus removal tools? There is a neat little one from Panda (yes, Panda) that I used just yesterday to clear remnants of sircam.
#6
Posted 21 June 2002 - 05:25 PM
Unfortunately, I'm not in charge of what software gets installed where... I just fix it when it breaks.
#7
Posted 21 June 2002 - 06:20 PM
#8
Posted 21 June 2002 - 08:48 PM
Thats Just my opinion
#9
Posted 23 June 2002 - 04:31 PM
Also, if you boot into MSDOS mode in 9x, you can scan from there with AVG (c:\progra~1\grisoft\avg6\avg), does Sophos or any other distribution offer that support? I have had to scan an infected drive with three different distributions before it is entirely clean.
#10
Posted 23 June 2002 - 11:39 PM
The Inter-Check monitor that comes with it is a great thing. It tells you that you may have a virus and leaves it to you to deal with it, using the actual Sweep for NT program. Saved me from countless trojans!!!
Its definetly one of the best Ant-Virus programs ive worked with, and it doesnt use up too much resources (less than 1% CPU on the slowest pc we got, 133mhz).
Go try Norton Anti-Virus too, thats pretty good aswell.
#11
Posted 24 June 2002 - 04:16 AM
I have used thier Corporate Edition, and Nortons for about 4 years now.
We managed 600 Machines with Norton and we avoided being hit by most of the big Viruses. McAfee is about as intuitive as Linux, but for home use I really Like Norton. I am biased of course, and itfwhat your using does what you need, then stick with it.
#12
Posted 24 June 2002 - 07:15 AM
McAfee sucks hard...
I am biased of course, and itfwhat your using does what you need, then stick with it.
LOL
That's a little more than normal "bias", but then again I think that everything made by Norton/Symantec is completely bloated and designed to get into everything on your system (and consequently trash it if you put on the "wrong" update or service pack). So I guess I am "biased" as well...;)
Some of the other AV platforms here sound interesting, but how is the centralized management of them (or is there even such a thing for them)? I might poke around a bit at Sophos just to see what it's about.
#13
Posted 24 June 2002 - 07:31 AM
#14
Posted 24 June 2002 - 07:34 AM
I still like it tho
Thier Corp AV is the best around hands down.
THier centralized control makes putting out virus wildfires a lot easier.
#15
Posted 24 June 2002 - 09:32 AM
#16
Posted 24 June 2002 - 10:49 AM

Help










