Compatible Support Forums: Upgrading plan !

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Upgrading plan !

#1 User is offline   Ant -|- One 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: 28-May 01

Posted 14 May 2002 - 10:35 PM


0

#2 User is offline   Davros 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 347
  • Joined: 21-March 02

Posted 14 May 2002 - 11:20 PM

You could get a powerleap slotket and put that 1.26ghz tualatin into your p3v4x. ATA100 will give you minimal performance boost over ATA66.

http://www.powerleap.com/Products/iP3T.htm
0

#3 User is offline   sapiens74 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1915
  • Joined: 30-March 00

Posted 15 May 2002 - 12:43 AM

VIA sucks.

Avoid them at all costs.
0

#4 User is offline   uboofer 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 27-January 02

Posted 15 May 2002 - 06:07 AM

I agree. Via make stable chipsets but in order to get any performance out of them you have to install Via 4-1 drivers and it still may not make them any run any better. Supposedly Micro$oft has built in support for Via in Windows XP but considering the problems I have ran into with M$ drivers in the past, on very common devices, I would not trust them. I would go with a more mainstream chipset such as Intels chipset, expecially with a Intel processor.
0

#5 User is offline   rh78 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 15-May 02

Posted 15 May 2002 - 06:46 AM

I followed a similar plan for my upgrade. I wanted to keep my older SDRAM so I went with a PIII Tualatin. But, went with an ASUS TUSL2-C motherboard. Can't go wrong with intel chipsets. I haven't had any problems so far, rock solid.
0

#6 User is offline   Davros 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 347
  • Joined: 21-March 02

Posted 15 May 2002 - 06:48 AM

I've had my P3V4X for 2 years and 3 months, since the day it was available. I have never had trouble of any kind with it in Win98, Win2K, WinXP, Win2K Advanced Server, Linux, and even Basilisk (Mac emu);) I even use Rivatuner to force AGP 4x and Fast Writes with my Hercules GF3500. Soundblaster runs fine too, and 1gb memory is fully operable.
Maybe this is because I took the 90 seconds required to install the 4in1 drivers?

Seriously, I believe VIA has had trouble supporting AMD platforms more that Intel. Anyone else care to add their experiences?

Here's my specs, running smooth as silk:

OS: Mostly Windows XP
Mobo: Asus P3V4X
CPU: P3 1GHZ w/ Asus slotket adapter
Memory: 1GB PC133 CAS 2 Mushkin
HDD: 30GB ATA66 WD, 80GB ATA100 WD - Both 7200 rpm
CDROM: Kenwood 72x (barely working - these suck!)
CDRW: Yamaha 16x10x40
Floppy: NEC
Video: Hercules GeForce 3 Ti500
Sound: Soundblaster Live! 5.1
Ethernet: 3COM SOHO-TX100, D-Link DFE 530TX
SCSI: Adaptec AIC-7850 (for scanner)
Scanner: Epson 1640SU
Printer: Epson 980
Monitor: Viewsonic PF790
Speakers: Cambridge Soundworks DTT2500
Keyboard: IBM Standard El Cheapo
Mouse: MS Intellimouse Explorer
Case: 3DCool.com
PSU: 300W came with case
0

#7 User is offline   Brian Frank 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3088
  • Joined: 21-January 01

Posted 15 May 2002 - 09:27 AM

I've about 6 different boards with various Via chipsets on both the Intel and AMD side. I have not had a problem with the chipsets. In fact some of the best boards I've owned used a Via chipset *pats trust Asus A7V*
0

#8 User is offline   Ant -|- One 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: 28-May 01

Posted 15 May 2002 - 11:53 AM


0

#9 User is offline   pmistry 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1047
  • Joined: 17-April 00

Posted 15 May 2002 - 05:31 PM

As for VIA Chipsets go, some people have major issues with them, but sometimes people blame the chipset when actually something else is at fault. There is nothing wrong with my VIA chipset on an AMD processor, it works fine. It took a while for VIA and MS to stabilize it under Windows 2000, but after SP1 it was all good. As for Windows XP right now, I am not using any VIA 4-In-1's it runs fine without them, older VIA chipsets are better left untouched. General rule, don't update unless you have problems. Do you really need the latest VIA 4-In-1's?
0

#10 User is offline   Davros 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 347
  • Joined: 21-March 02

Posted 15 May 2002 - 07:46 PM

XP has 4in1's built in, but I don't know which version.
0

#11 User is offline   Ant -|- One 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 140
  • Joined: 28-May 01

Posted 15 May 2002 - 11:58 PM

With my present mobo (P3V4X), I didn't installed 4in1's under XP, I didn't feel the need to install them.

As for my upgrading plan, I decided to invest in Asus A7V333 + Athlon 1700+. I already bought the ram (256Mo DDR Pc2100). The rest will come after I return from holidays.

Any cons about my choice ?
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users