Norton AV 2002 or Norton Corp.Ed 7.61 ?
#1
Posted 08 May 2002 - 04:28 AM
This would be for a standalone laptop, P-4/1.7GHz/1024MB RAM etc.,
running Outlook XP (on a POP/SMTP ISP, no Exchange).
The client has both Norton Anti Virus 2002 as well as Norton AV Corporate Edition 7.61 - any pros & cons between the both?
Performance wise-realtime scanning speed, Word document opening speed, efficiency, virus-catching performance etc., does one differ all that much from the other?
TIA,
Chip
#2
Posted 08 May 2002 - 09:09 AM
#3
Posted 08 May 2002 - 11:21 AM
They do have slightly different interfaces, but they both scan through the same engine and are both equally good at catching virus's.
I use Corporate Edition at work where all my PC's are managed from a central server.
I use NAV 2002 at home because, well because you cannot just buy a copy of corporate edition, it has to be purchased via licenses.
#4
Posted 08 May 2002 - 02:43 PM
#5
Posted 08 May 2002 - 03:42 PM
Thanks.
#6
Posted 08 May 2002 - 06:27 PM
NAV Corp 7.61 has snap-ins for both Lotus Notes and MS Outlook.
#7
Posted 08 May 2002 - 08:02 PM
This is because the Real time scanner will be set to 'Smart Scan' for only certain attachments, as opposed to all files (for system speed).
Also, in NAV 2002, if I disable the Office PlugIn, will .doc & .xls files still be scanned by the RealTime scanner if those extensions are in the 'extensions to be scanned' list ?
Thanks.
#8
Posted 08 May 2002 - 09:25 PM
#9
Posted 08 May 2002 - 10:32 PM
That is every file is automatically scanned before execution.
All e-mail is scanned before being sent and every e-mail is scanned as it arrives into my inbox.
The overhead due to this high level of security is non existant.
#10
Posted 08 May 2002 - 11:36 PM
#11
Posted 09 May 2002 - 12:11 AM
#12
Posted 09 May 2002 - 12:27 AM
#14
Posted 09 May 2002 - 01:26 PM
#15
Posted 09 May 2002 - 07:21 PM

Help










