Compatible Support Forums: 3DMark Scores!

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3DMark Scores!

#1 User is offline   Marktait 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 430
  • Joined: 09-April 01

Posted 25 April 2002 - 08:59 PM

Hi guyz, i thought you would like to see a post of everyones 3dmarks so here ya go guyz, please post your 3dmarks from either/both of 2000/2001

My scores

3DMark 2000 - 11075
3DMark 2001SE - 8004

(Both fully registered)

AMD AthlonXP 1800+
Gigabyte GA-7DXR+ w/USB2
512MB DDR PC2100RAM w/DDR Memory Cooling Kit
GeForce3 Ti200 64MB /Det 28.32
60GB IBM 7200RPM HDD
LG 16x/48x DVDDrive
LiteOn 16x/10x/40x CDRWDrive
Hauppauge WinTV PrimioFM
Realtek Genius 10/100 NIC Card
Creative 1024 Live! Player
Cambridge Soundworks 1600 Speakers
Tsunami 400Watt PSU
Windows XP Pro w/IE6 SP1
0

#2 User is offline   Palos 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 723
  • Joined: 05-February 00

Posted 25 April 2002 - 11:21 PM

~3100 in 3Dmark2001SE (1024x768x32bit, AA off)

Athlon 1.33 Tbird
Epox 8KHA DDR mobo
512 PC2100 Samsung CAS2.5
Asus V7100 Pro (Geforce2MX-400)
...
the rest doesn't really matter smile
0

#3 User is offline   CrazyKillerMan 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 761
  • Joined: 14-October 00

Posted 26 April 2002 - 01:38 AM

7108 - 3dmark 2001
1024x768x32bit - AA off

AMD 1.2 GHz
512 DDR - Micron
Asus A7M-266 (AMD 761 Chipset)
ATi Radeon 8500
2 - Maxtor ata133 40 GH in RAID 0 on promise fasttrak 100
Win XP Pro
0

#4 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 27 April 2002 - 03:04 AM

A shocking 11000 smile not even tweaked, im well pleased to say the least.

http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3352621
0

#5 User is offline   NotSoSmart 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 29-February 00

Posted 29 April 2002 - 03:05 PM

Asus P4T-E
P4-1.6@1.920
512 RDram
Gainward 4400(stock no overclock)

3DMark 2001SE 9586
0

#6 User is offline   Palos 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 723
  • Joined: 05-February 00

Posted 29 April 2002 - 07:07 PM

Jeezus...I think Im last with my poor 3100 3Dmarks, lol. The videocard seems to make a huge difference.
0

#7 User is offline   CrazyKillerMan 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 761
  • Joined: 14-October 00

Posted 29 April 2002 - 07:58 PM

huge differance

Going from 3600 with radeon 64 meg DDR, to approz 7100 with 8500.
Same system
0

#8 User is offline   NotSoSmart 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 29-February 00

Posted 30 April 2002 - 02:46 AM

My same system with my GF2 GTS Pro score was 4400 so yes IMHO if you have a 1.3 CPU or better you can get lots better performance with a video card upgrade.
0

#9 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 30 April 2002 - 03:09 AM

Ah it doesnt matter really, 3dmarks mean nothing. As long as you can run your games well with your current setup there is no need to change anything.
0

#10 User is offline   sapiens74 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1915
  • Joined: 30-March 00

Posted 30 April 2002 - 04:23 AM

no ****. who cares
0

#11 User is offline   Brian Frank 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3088
  • Joined: 21-January 01

Posted 01 May 2002 - 09:50 AM

I like posting my stuff, regardless of what people already had. My blood, sweat, and tears (okay, no crying was involved---lots of swearing at points tho) were involved in putting each machine together. I know darn well I'm not gonna have the highest 3D Mark score, but they are good refrences and fun to compare. But, in the end, it doesn't even matter...:p I've had 2 different motherboards run through here recently for my main rig, and playing games, I can't tell a damn difference. 3D Mark scores, yeah, a 500 point diff is big, but even watching it, there's not a whole big difference, as the system is still PDQ.
0

#12 User is offline   Hammer91 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 04-March 02

Posted 01 May 2002 - 05:09 PM

"A shocking 11000 not even tweaked, im well pleased to say the least."

Your front side bus is bumped to 123Mhz, isn't that a "tweak" =)

My last 3dmark2001se score was 10,027, thats COMPLETELY stock settings,no overclocking at all =)

Hammer
0

#13 User is offline   Mr.Guvernment 

  • veteran
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1441
  • Joined: 04-January 01

Posted 08 February 2003 - 10:27 AM

hehe, had to post..lol (not that this score means jack to me but amusing to see how excited some people get over it!)


work system below (p4 2.4) - fresh install - standard tests - 14543 - no tweaks, no over clocking.

Code:

Score: 14543     
 
Date:  2003-01-14 
CPU:  Intel Pentium 4 2386 MHz 
GPU:  ATI RADEON 9700/9500 Series 
OS:  Microsoft Windows XP 
Res:  1024x768 32bit 

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5630581


0

#14 User is offline   adamvjackson 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2174
  • Joined: 26-August 02

Posted 08 February 2003 - 10:47 AM

Well, I think it's fairly safe to say most everyone's score(s) will be going down with the soon-to-be-released 3DMark03... Rumor has it that it will be released Feb. 11th, for those who are interested.
0

#15 User is offline   Champion_R 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 25-October 01

Posted 08 February 2003 - 11:43 AM

Quote:
Well, I think it's fairly safe to say most everyone's score(s) will be going down with the soon-to-be-released 3DMark03... Rumor has it that it will be released Feb. 11th, for those who are interested.

Maybe I can get sub 1000 if I don't upgrade my graphics hardware frown
0

#16 User is offline   Marktait 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 430
  • Joined: 09-April 01

Posted 10 February 2003 - 01:05 AM

3dmark 2001SE

check my sig, i do have my GF4 o/c to 350/685 aswell. laugh
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users