Why was my thread locked?
#1
Posted 18 December 2001 - 11:50 PM
#2
Posted 18 December 2001 - 11:57 PM
If my thread in the Win2k APPz forum is closed, why is it set sticky? I was doing a good thing for many people, I know many people who wanted to use WMP 8, but use Win2k.
Even if you feel my threads promote "*****", that is no reason to delete the entire thing, simply removing the link would suffice.
#3
Posted 19 December 2001 - 01:53 AM
#4
Posted 19 December 2001 - 04:01 AM
I say it more time there is no Windows Media Player 8 for Win2000 it only for WinXP that is the only official support for WMP8..
Q: Will there be a Windows Media Player 8 for Windows2000.
A: NO as in NEVER.
#5
Posted 19 December 2001 - 06:55 AM
2) There are a lot of things not supported by MS. I don't see you closing threads to about PowerToys though! Or, if you use your arguement that Powertoys can be downloaded from the MS site, even though not supported by them, how about that ISO recording program that utilizes XPs built in burning capabilities? That isn't on the MS site, nor is it supported by them, yet I didn't see THAT thread closed, so what gives?
3)If you plan on closing someone thread, they should be informed that you are doing so and your reasons for doing so, personally, ie by email. It is a simple curtesy that administrators owe their users, you should know that! If I hadn't been subscribed to the thread here I prolly never would have knows about it, or known that you think I did something wrong.
4) I used to be a forum administrator myself, I've been in your position, but I justified myself clearly on any occasion I needed to use my administrative/moderative rights. The messages you edited didn't even have an edited tag on the bottom of them to show that you had edited the original content, which in my mind crosses the line between moderation and a few things I've been on both ends of and really don't want to get into right now.
#6
Posted 19 December 2001 - 07:06 AM
PowerToys is on microsoft web site now there a big diff.
As for ISO recording program that utilizes for XPs he has the source code and got and OK from MS on it I beat you didn't know that.
#7
Posted 19 December 2001 - 07:16 AM
If I were a cartoon, there would be steam shooting from my ears, I am so angry right now.
#8
Posted 19 December 2001 - 07:50 AM
#9
Posted 19 December 2001 - 08:04 AM
brainsoft it not that I don't agree with you but as philipp said.
#10
Posted 19 December 2001 - 08:17 AM
Hell, look in your own signature even! Unofficial software and drivers! tsk tsk!
#11
Posted 19 December 2001 - 11:00 AM
I don't have anything against wa*ez but this forum isn't the right place for it.
The point is that the hacked version of Windows Media Player violates copyright laws, no matter how insignificant the change was.
Anyway, thanks for the link
#12
Posted 19 December 2001 - 03:39 PM
http://www.banfi.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/x3dfx/drivers.htm
I'm around ***** often enough and I still firmly believe that someone porting WMP8 to the parent of it's original OS is not *****! ugh!
#13
Posted 19 December 2001 - 03:44 PM
There's no need to start a war about the locked post.If the admins of the site found it that it should be locked, then they have the right to do so even if it sounds unreasonable.They build the rules and they will be in trouble if some MS guy checks out the forum and realises that there is a violation in the copyright laws, not you.
What i'm trying to say is that there's no point to continue this argument-it won't lead anywhere.Realise that there's nothing personal with you or with any other member of this forum.
Take care.
#14
Posted 19 December 2001 - 09:01 PM
1. The package is mostly if not fully composed of files taken from Windows XP. If your read the EULA distribution of these files separate from the CD is not allowed. Therefore any inclusion of these files into a separate package is illegal. Since NTCompatible is a high profile site referenced by such magazines as PCGamer/Windows 2000 Magazine and across the net for NTCompatible help it's obvious why SHS does not want it posted here.
2. This is Phillip's site. Not yours. His. If he say's it goes. It goes. You don't like it? Go to iexbeta or alt.binaries or whatever IRC site you want to post links to unofficial software.
#15
Posted 20 December 2001 - 05:08 AM
And second, If I don't like something, I speak up. If nothing changes, I live with it, or leave. There is a LOT of unofficial software posted here though. I appreciated the first half of your reply though.
#16
Posted 20 December 2001 - 10:09 AM
This may blow you away brainsoft I have had Hardware Manufacturers send some of there user to me for HELP on old Video card/Sound card/TV card/Modem/Nic/SCSI card and lot other thing that don't have any Windows2000/XP support that need custom INF to get working sometime this works with buying newer hardware that dose have support for newer Windows OS oh even MS them self send to me.
As DosFreak said we are very high profile site referenced not just by such thing as magazines like PCGamer/Windows 2000 Magazine/Maximum PC but TV show as well like TechTV "The ScreenSavers" which AIR all over the world and not only that but Game/Applications Dev.
#17
Posted 24 December 2001 - 11:45 AM
Also, you need to rethink the definition of Wa@ez and what a Wa@ez web site is.
This SHS fellow sounds like an egotistical and inconsiderate idiot.
#18
Posted 25 December 2001 - 08:42 AM
#19
Posted 25 December 2001 - 09:09 AM
I'm not informed on the driver situation here, but I'm kinda suspicious as to the hacked drivers. This is a high-profile site, and I don't think SHS would be doing this on purpose. And that's if they are hacked. If they are a real legal problem, I'm sure SHS will take them down.

Help










