Compatible Support Forums: XP-What do you think of it now?

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

XP-What do you think of it now?

#1 User is offline   Speed4Ever 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 30-November 01

Posted 02 December 2001 - 02:04 AM

Now that its been out for over a month, and the "newness" has worn off...
0

#2 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 03:27 AM

Now that I have "un-dumbed" it down, I really like it. Plus, I can now run more of my older games on it.
0

#3 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 06:40 AM

Well if I could run it..... I've been using XP since the first beta all the way up to the RTM. It's only the RTM that's had the "infinite loop" problems. That's why 2000 is still my main OS. Also due to the frustrations of dealing with the small oddities in XP that I don't feel like wasting my time on.
0

#4 User is offline   EddiE314 

  • Pooh-Bah
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1778
  • Joined: 18-January 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 11:18 AM

i only get Inf. Loop Errors with Detonator 4 drivers + DivX ;-) encoded videos. other than that, i have been using it also since some of the first betas, and as of now (RTM) i love it, i thought it was kick-a.ss ever since build 2446, although 2526 was my fav build, 2600 is great too.
0

#5 User is offline   three 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 10-November 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 01:33 PM

what impressed me the most was no more need to click 'start' 'turn off computer' 'turn off' anymore...a simple push of the power button automatically turns it off! wow! that's how it should have been all along!
0

#6 User is offline   Cynan 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 369
  • Joined: 15-November 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 02:57 PM

three, that was there all the time dude smile

I like most of it, and what I don't like I can turn off.. wicked smile
0

#7 User is offline   three 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 10-November 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 05:13 PM

i never saw that in Win2000, WinNT, Win98 or in Win95
0

#8 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 02 December 2001 - 11:11 PM

It was an ACPI function in Win2K for sure, and I think may have shown itself in Win98 and WinME. It was found in the "Power" control applet (or you could get to it from the screensaver selection tab and click the "Power..." button). I use the button to go into Standby mode myself.
0

#9 User is offline   three 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 10-November 00

Posted 03 December 2001 - 03:01 AM

heh, i guess i'm one of those folks that was too lazy to mess around with those settings...heh, i also didn't know that you could view picture files in thumbnails under explorer :p

..also i've only had the inf loop problem one time, that's it...i guess i'm lucky, using the recent xp driver from Nvidia 21.83 on my Leadtek Geforce2mx SH Pro.

has anybody checked out the Remote Connection feature? It Kicks A$$, i like it alot better than VNC
0

#10 User is offline   Brian Frank 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3088
  • Joined: 21-January 01

Posted 04 December 2001 - 07:55 AM

I think once SP1 comes out it should be even better. As for now it's still got some quirks to it. One I noticed and don't remember it in the beta 2 or RC1 is XP keeps thinking you have a disc in that you don't and haven't for a while. It's annoying as you have to right click on that drive so you can hit open. So far so good tho. I'll end up moving my other rig to it in a while.
0

#11 User is offline   insaNity 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 155
  • Joined: 09-November 01

Posted 05 December 2001 - 06:55 PM

wow, so Im not the only one getting infinite loops in the detonator drivers... Every time I update, it think its gone then a few days later - BAM! it gets me again... it happens sometimes when I launch a game or movie, and I found that turning off the NV Quick Tweak thing in msconfig helps sometimes.

OTHER THAN THAT, Nothing has managed to crash XP on me, and Im also impressed with the game performance. It is a little slower than 2k for 2D stuff though (dont argue with this - why do u think the requirements are greater? - If you have a very fast system you probably wont tell the difference)

But yes, over all I think its the best windows to use. It's a good balance of compatibility/speed/stability.
However, if I could get games performing well under 2K (like many people tell me it does) I would use that, because 2K is XP without the bloat and bugs.
0

#12 User is offline   Speed4Ever 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 48
  • Joined: 30-November 01

Posted 07 December 2001 - 02:43 AM

It's both fortunate, and strange, that I havent seen these Infinite loop errors yet. Is there a connection with the detonators and a certain type(s) of configuration(s)?

I used to run the 22.83's, am now running 23.11. Not a problem yet.

I'd love to know more about this...
0

#13 User is offline   Zythum 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 08-December 01

Posted 08 December 2001 - 08:53 PM

-Yes, it's stable, so Win 3.1 is the same ting smile
-The look of XP is great
-Multiusager is sameting of Mac OS 8/9??
-Microsoft is the Leader for OS, so it's better?
0

#14 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 10 December 2001 - 09:23 PM

XP=Win2000 for dummies.

But hey it does the job it was designed for and i would have to say well done MS as its actually an excellent OS.
0

#15 User is offline   whoisurdaddy 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 242
  • Joined: 11-July 00

Posted 11 December 2001 - 02:41 AM

Personally, I like Win2k better for performance wise but WinXP is pretty much as good as Win2k. Plus, WinXP has better GUI and other good features like ability to hide programs that are run at the startup but you don't use often. Remote Desktop is another thing I like about WinXP.
0

#16 User is offline   ptweasel 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 11-December 01

Posted 11 December 2001 - 09:55 AM

Quote:

XP=Win2000 for dummies.


XP=Win2k with new features that dummies can't figure out how to disable wink

Seriously, I don't really see that much of a difference from 2k now that I've tweaked it a little and turned off a bunch of unneeded services. However, most of those same services were enabled by default on Win2k just like they are on XP.

I just don't see why such a big deal has been made of XP. I mean, it's NT 5.1 which makes it the WinME of the NT world, only it actually works.
0

#17 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 11 December 2001 - 01:55 PM

Wow a quote from me!

Thing is that i have yet to see anything that i can run on XP that i cant on 2000, so not much point in me using it.

BTW stuff like remote desktop were already in win2000, just there were tucked away so they wernt so obvious. Remote desktop is in netmeeting for example.

[EDIT]
I just have to say that if transport tycoon deluxe worked on XP that would give me a reason to 'upgrade' cos that game 'rocks'. smile
0

#18 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 11 December 2001 - 06:28 PM

I think Rollercoaster Tycoon was a major reason for Atreyu to upgrade, because it rocks (as you can see, I am from the US and I don't need quotes around "rocks" when used in a sentence HAHAHAHAH!!!).

Is WinXP oversimplified? I thought Win2K was WAY oversimplified when coming from NT4 and Novell, but I got used to it and really liked the platform quite a bit. Almost all of the statements being made about WinXP now were being made about Win2K when it was released. Personally, I dig the new Start Menu and some of the other features (larger thumbnails for picture browsing, which was all I used ACDesee [sp] for anyway) along with the major performance increase on faster machines.
0

#19 User is offline   yakkob 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 461
  • Joined: 14-March 00

Posted 11 December 2001 - 07:59 PM

W2k just seems more stable...thats all smile

Oh yeah, tonight I am gonna see if carmageddon 2 works on my Wxp Home ver pc.

/me crosses fingers.
0

#20 User is offline   JP- 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1015
  • Joined: 29-June 01

Posted 11 December 2001 - 08:30 PM

It doesnt work smile

If it did then xp would totally 'rock', see now your just giving me an excuse to say 'rock'.
0

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users