On a home pc, not networked, which is better?? Fat32 or NTFS on this system...
---------------------------------
1.2Ghz@1.32Ghz AMDK7 Athlon Thunderbird
512MB PC133 Hyundai RAM
ATX Gigabyte 71XE4 Motherboard
40GB Seagate ATA/100 5400RPM
16x 10x 40x LiteON ReWriter
40x Compaq CDDrive
17" NEC Monitor
64MB Nvidia GeForce 2Mx
Ambient 56k V.92Fax Modem
Creative 128PCI Soundcard
Hauppage WinTV Card with Radio
This is because I only want Windows 2000 on...fed up with ME and '98 8)
Thanks!
Page 1 of 1
Ntfs Or Fat32??
#2
Posted 28 September 2001 - 08:19 PM
Always NTFS.... Its just a better overall kernal. (my opinion of course, but this board seems to share this opinion with me as well)
#3
Posted 28 September 2001 - 08:35 PM
NTFS is the way to go. I use it on every machine where I install 2000.
#4
Posted 28 September 2001 - 08:43 PM
Thanx mate, just noticed you have directx 8.1 where did you get that because i downloaded it and it was an out of date beta...
thanx v.much
thanx v.much
#5
Posted 28 September 2001 - 09:36 PM
In my experience, any loss of speed is unnoticeable going to NTFS from FAT32, and the only way I knew that was running benchmarks and guesstimating.
#6
Posted 01 October 2001 - 08:30 AM
Also system memory. With less than 32mb of system ram NTFS is a hog.
#7
Posted 01 October 2001 - 09:29 AM
it also depends if ur dual booting with other operating systems. say if ur dual booting with win98 or winme then u need to run FAT32 inorder for the other OSes to see ur files.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help










