3Dfx Windows XP Petition
#1
Posted 10 September 2001 - 07:44 PM
Read more
#2
Posted 10 September 2001 - 08:11 PM
In addition, NVIDIA did not acquire 3dfx (the company), they only acquired their IP. Again, support was a 3dfx issue.
#3
Posted 10 September 2001 - 09:10 PM
I feel that it a lost cause on their part. If you have to go to XP, then get a different card. Plain and simple.
#4
Posted 10 September 2001 - 09:15 PM
The fact that drivers haven't been supplied for WindowsXP is NOT Nvidia's problem! If these people want to point fingers, at least point the finger at the company at fault here: 3DFX!
#5
Posted 10 September 2001 - 09:26 PM
3DFX is dead, and so is their product line. Try to revive something useful like the "SpaceORB". Now THAT was a kicka$$ controller...
#6
Posted 10 September 2001 - 11:42 PM
Unless I'm wrong, Nvidia never said anything about giving any support from the start, and that driver support for 3dfx cards would be exclusively from 3dfx. I've heard about a movement to make drivers, but I don't think we'll see much from them.
If 3dfx had gotten the V5 and V4 out much sooner than they were released, they might have been in business still. Your competitors won't sit around until you release your killer product. If they're smart, they'll be working on an even better product to grab more of your market. That's what happened. Nvidia is making sure to stay on top of its product support, which I can't say for some of it's competitors.
I refuse to get another ATI card again if the product is hindered by drivers. While their DVD playback is supposed to be great, the ATI DVD software has caused problems in one form or another in the systems I've seen.
I do hope that ATI does get their drivers straightened out or Nvidia will remain on top. Doesn't matter how good the hardware is if the drivers are bad.
#7
Posted 10 September 2001 - 11:57 PM
At the time when all the hoopla was going on, alot of websites ran interviews with David Perez, Nvidia's PR man. (dont know if he's still there or not)
At any rate, this issue was raised back then, and Perez said time and time again in every interview that the deal with 3Dfx was for their technology, and that driver and product support would still be in 3DFX's hands.
Hell, I even recall a FAQ posted on Nvidia's website about it back then saying the same thing. How many times and how many different ways do they need to say this before people understand?
#8
Posted 11 September 2001 - 12:25 AM
#9
Posted 11 September 2001 - 01:32 AM
#10
Posted 11 September 2001 - 01:44 AM
Worse case is Nvidia won't do anything. Best case is folks who bought a card thinking they would have support for a while get drivers so they can run XP.
#11
Posted 11 September 2001 - 02:30 AM
#12
Posted 11 September 2001 - 02:51 AM
Nvidia is not responsible to hold up 3dfx end of the bargin. If they do hold anything that could help 3dfx owners, they have the right to do what they wish with it. They have no obligation to support 3dfx cards, even if they were given the choice to do so.
#13
Posted 11 September 2001 - 05:35 AM
I think some people just choose to be ignorant, regardless of the facts out there.
Ignorance is bliss. - From Somebody
Ignorannce can be a powerful thing. - DosFreak
#14
Posted 11 September 2001 - 05:57 AM
#16
Posted 11 September 2001 - 08:20 AM
#17
Posted 11 September 2001 - 10:37 AM
So who is providing the support for these cards since they are still being sold? When I asked in PC World (and there is no way i believe anything from them ;() they said NVIDIA has said they will support the cards.
So does anyone have an exact answer?
#18
Posted 11 September 2001 - 03:15 PM
I'd guess that that that PC World store didn't get the message: 3dfx is dead, so buy the Voodoo's at your own risk. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Nvidia to put out 3dfx drivers---products for which they are not experts on or designed---which have no guarantee that Nvidia may be able to get them to work well under XP, and face stubborn 3dfx users who will expect the V5 to compete with the GTS and up. I personally think the V5 is the best match to a GTS, but there are still some situations where a GF 2 MX outperforms it.
If your not going to move to XP, 3dfx cards will work fine, but I wouldn't use them for any normal operation. Backup, yes, but not for primary use any more. The cards are a bottleneck, especially the V4: it's just a 32MB V3 with no TV-out function.
#19
Posted 11 September 2001 - 04:47 PM
I Just went from a Voodoo 3 3500 to a Geforce 2 Pro due to the lack of drivers, and I have a question if 3DFX have been disolved then how come in my local stores (I tried PC World, Dixons, plus local retaillers) 90% of the stores i looked in had a Voodoo card either a 4 or 5.
So who is providing the support for these cards since they are still being sold? When I asked in PC World (and there is no way i believe anything from them ;() they said NVIDIA has said they will support the cards.
So does anyone have an exact answer?
That would have more to do with the distribution chain in your location than anything else. Here in the US, some stores pulled their 3DFX stock immediately and began seeking their return credit while there was a company to get that from. Now, in retail (and some other market segments) there are *generally* 2 main price points that a distributor can fall under:
1. Buy products for price X, and get return/RMA support from the manufacturer (you will see this a lot in most things)
2. Buy products for price *Y* (10% or more in price reduction, in general) and get *NO* return/RMA support from the manufacturer (you will see this in items that have a low fatality rate, or the cost of processing returned items is more than the item is worth to either of the parties concerned).
I remember an auto parts retailer in the US did that for automotive/light truck batteries, as they simply cost too much to keep shipping back and forth and generally made it to their life expectancy with little fuss. In your case, a distributor could have chosen to get the cards for as cheap as possible and forgo the possibility of return, since the hardware segment sees price drops so often they were probably looking for a cusion to pad their profit margins in the future. Another scenario could have the distributor knowingly buy all the stock they could get their hands on for an incredibly reduced cost ("fire sale" liquidation) and hope they could move the inventory to people that wouldn't know any different (similar to what GM is doing with Oldsmobile right now).
So, does this answer your question?
#20
Posted 12 September 2001 - 01:25 AM
LOL! It's funny, yet sad at the same time. Why should nVidia even bother to support anything from 3DFX? All those people that bought 3DFX products MADE their respective choices a while back NOT to get an nVidia product. Yet, nVidia is supposed to "support" their now-defunct competitor's product line because they bought them out? HAHAHAHAHA! I mean come on, think about it. Hell, it was hard enough to get 3DFX to support older product lines when they were in business, and most companies don't bother with them once they exceed 12-18 months in "age". NVidia has supported all their older stuff beyond the industry average for quite a while with the unified driver distribution, and there are tons of drivers to choose from for your particular use. Personally, I am just hoping that the new line from ATI is going to work half as well as advertised and will do some serious damage to nVidia.
3DFX is dead, and so is their product line. Try to revive something useful like the "SpaceORB". Now THAT was a kicka$$ controller...
I don't really care either way, since I own an S3 card now, and plan on upgrading with an ATi card, but...
I wonder if the sentiments would be the same if HP decided not to support any Compaq products.
Yeah, I didn't think so.
-bZj

Help










