which desktop
#2
Posted 17 February 2004 - 09:40 PM
#3
Posted 18 February 2004 - 01:32 AM
#4
Posted 18 February 2004 - 01:41 AM
Daum
#5
Posted 18 February 2004 - 01:43 AM
#7
Posted 18 February 2004 - 04:40 AM
#8
Posted 18 February 2004 - 06:23 AM
I would hold off on IceWM for Fedora. I tried for three days to get it working satisfactorily on my mom's box and never could get it set up right. When I got it installed, apt-get kept recognizing it as a broken package and the only fix for it was to uninstall it. After I installed it with the latest RPM, I starting having problems. I tried to uninstall the rpm, and it said it wasn't installed. When I tried to reinstall it, said it WAS installed! I tried the tarball, and when I did ./configure, it checked and said it couldn't continue because I didn't have X windows!! The fonts on the menu didn't look right and nothing I tried would correct it. I finally gave up and just ran the Gnome DE. This is not good since IceWM is now my old friendly and familiar DE. I guess I could upgrade my RH9 box to Fedora and fight it for a while and maybe or maybe not getting it working, but I'm not real exited about that prospect. Maybe it's time to have a hard look at Gentoo which DOES have IceWM in their portage tree.
#9
Posted 18 February 2004 - 09:58 AM
but everyone has their personal preference
#10
Posted 21 February 2004 - 06:26 AM
Daum
#11
Posted 21 February 2004 - 07:28 AM
aterm -tr -bg black -fg gray -sh 100% -tint white -ls
#12
Posted 21 February 2004 - 09:04 AM
#13
Posted 23 February 2004 - 01:41 AM
Daum
#14
Posted 23 February 2004 - 03:22 AM
#15
Posted 23 February 2004 - 04:54 AM
Daum
#16
Posted 23 February 2004 - 06:43 AM
#18
Posted 23 February 2004 - 03:27 PM
#19
Posted 23 February 2004 - 03:35 PM
multi-gnome-terminal --transparent
Does not return a transparent terminal for me either.
#20
Posted 23 February 2004 - 10:08 PM
Daum

Help










