Is Windows ME Realible I would like to hear form users
#1
Posted 14 September 2000 - 08:57 PM
#2
Posted 14 September 2000 - 09:58 PM
If you want stability go with WIn2000 and if u want very goos stability but lots of pain, then go with Linux.
#3
Posted 14 September 2000 - 10:08 PM
Sorry you came to the wrong forum.
#4
Posted 15 September 2000 - 03:49 AM
#5
Posted 15 September 2000 - 04:37 AM
------------------
My System
Dell Demension XPS T500
Triple Boot Windows 2000 Pro 2195 (allways reliable) / Windows Whistler Pro 2250 (cool but buggy) / Windows Millennium Final (waste of disk space)
PIII @ 500 Mhz (with after market heatsink and dual fan)
128 Megs Ram
TNT2 Ultra Graphics Card (with the core and memory overclocked by 20 Mhz and dual voodoo coolers)
Matrox Millennium PCI (for second monitor)
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Card
3Com 56k Modem
12.6 Gig IBM HD
40X CD Rom Drive
100 Mb Zip Drive
#6
Posted 15 September 2000 - 05:16 AM
#7
Posted 15 September 2000 - 06:49 PM
#8
Posted 15 September 2000 - 11:15 PM
When Whistler is out, I doubt that many will want it.
1) It could become a pay-per-month OS
that's the only reason I can think of
but to pay per month of an OS is pathetic
------------------
-------------------------
Because I can.....
-------------------------
#10
Posted 16 September 2000 - 04:42 AM
For the original question, is windows me more reliable? Nope, it is not. For all my experiences till now with it, it's even more unstable because of the extra features (system recovery and animated help pages)
9x is evil, please if you have chance dual boot something win2k and make sure your game developers and hardware manufactorers get to know if something is not working.
We must do what we can so Gamers finally can enjoy great stability (no need to reboot), true pre-emtive multitasking (smoother FPS) and real 32-bit operations (better performance).
But first we need drivers optimized.
#11
Posted 16 September 2000 - 06:20 AM
------------------
-------------------------
Because I can.....
-------------------------
#12
Posted 17 September 2000 - 03:53 AM
I personally won't pay for something per month if I don't have to....and when it comes to software...I DEFINITELY won't **RENT** and OS for my OWNED computer.
I have a feeling that if MS does that, there will also be releases for people that want to OWN copies, and not want their software still owned by another company.
I.E. when I buy something, it'd damned well better be MINE.
#13
Posted 17 September 2000 - 09:40 AM
#14
Posted 26 September 2000 - 12:22 AM
So I'm thining about going back to Win 98 first edition for a while or even Win 98 SE, not sure yet, but booting out of Win2K and into Win 98 just to play nfs hs is a real pain in the a$$. Also none of the editing tools work either.
Biut I guess this is the real pain in the padded a$$, my CD writer I can't get SCSI drivers for my SCSI 2 card so I'm really stuffed.
Oh well trhe thing I love about Win 2K, stability, PC not crashed for 3 weeks, and the fact that the internet just flies along even on my 56k V90 modem !!
And paying for an o/sper month ? MS can't enforce that, thats just stupid, its like paying for your electrcity/phone/gas who'd wanna do that ???
------------------
------
My Computer
Pentium II 350
Gigabyte 6BXC M/B
16 meg Voodoo 3 2000 AGP
128 Meg of RAM
18 gig Western Digital Expert HDD UDMA 66
Sound Blaster Live ! 256
56k Modula Tech V90 USB modem
4 x SCSI writer
Advansys Host SCSI controller
#15
Posted 27 September 2000 - 06:21 PM
AMD K6 III 450
nVidia TNT2
128K
SB Live

Help










