Compatible Support Forums: Windows ME CPU Detection

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Windows ME CPU Detection

#1 User is offline   Ekstreme 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 464
  • Joined: 30-October 99

Posted 14 September 2000 - 05:59 AM

Does anyone know if it's possible to get around the CPU speed detection during the winME setup??
I have a P133 laptop with 32 meg ram.

Thanks in advance
0

#2 User is offline   Ge0ph 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 220
  • Joined: 03-March 00

Posted 14 September 2000 - 06:17 AM

You might try a WindowsMe forum.

[This message has been edited by Ge0ph (edited 14 September 2000).]
0

#3 User is offline   Igor 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 382
  • Joined: 24-July 99

Posted 14 September 2000 - 06:28 AM

You can overclock yor CPU just to get though the 1st setup stage. I don't think it checks it ever again. Plus 133 usualy works well as 150 or even 166 ;-)
0

#4 User is offline   Ekstreme 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 464
  • Joined: 30-October 99

Posted 14 September 2000 - 06:42 AM

Thanks for the intelligent reply, Igor, but being a laptop, I haven't been able to find a way to do such a thing. I've tried soft FSB, but I dunno anything about the motherboard, besides, ya kinda need an OS isntalled to use it smile

Any other ideas are certainly welcomed smile
0

#5 User is offline   radu185 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 17
  • Joined: 30-July 00

Posted 14 September 2000 - 08:56 AM

Theres a patch somewhere, to get past the 150mhz CPU limit.........might try www.flukex.com in the files, or links section


------------------
Obligatory System Specs
Intel MU440EX(latest BIOS)
Celeron366 @ 366mhz
128MB PC100-CAS2
Maxtor 10gb
3dfx Voodoo Banshee
Yamaha YMF740
Aztech 56kPCI
Liteon 32x CDROM
MicroATX POS case
14in Kenitec@1024x768x16
0

#6 User is offline   Toby 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 313
  • Joined: 17-January 00

Posted 14 September 2000 - 09:53 AM

Try the flag /nm

like: setup.exe /nm

it should work...

WinME sucks by the way laugh


// Toby
0

#7 User is offline   Ekstreme 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 464
  • Joined: 30-October 99

Posted 14 September 2000 - 11:15 AM

Thanks radu185 and Toby, helped out a shit load. I'm off to try smile

BTW Thanks for restoring my faith in the newer forum users.

laugh

------------------
****************************************
Intel PIII 450
ASUS P2B-F (BIOS 1013a)
128 MB PC 100 SDRam
64 MB PC 133 SDRam
Diamond Viper 770 32Mb TNT2 (Det. 6.18)
Quantum Fireball CR 8.4Gb IDE HDD
Quantum Atlas II 4.5Gb SCSI HDD
Iomega 100MB internal IDE ZIP Drive
Tekram DC-310 SCSI Adapter
Panasonic CW-7502 8x4 SCSI CD-R
Mitsubishi Diamond Data 32x IDE CD Rom
Creative Sound Blaster PCI 64 (ES 1370)
Logitech Wingman Extreme Digital 3D USB Joystick
Epson Stylus Color 400 Printer
Dynalink V1456VQE-R External 56k V.90 Modem
Daewoo 710b 17" Monitor
Windows 2000 2195 SP1
****************************************
#NTCompatible on UNDERNET!!!
0

#8 User is offline   jdulmage 

  • veteran
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1203
  • Joined: 27-October 00

Posted 15 September 2000 - 12:02 AM

you could say "Windows Me" sucks....but I can tell you that it's better than Windows 2000 as of this date for these reasons

1) Compatibility is good in ME, windows 2000 as just touched the surface on that issue

2) SubWoofer and bass settings, i have a SB 128 and no drivers for 2000 allow me to turn up the bass, therefore, my subwoofer sounds like "just another speaker"...next to no bass comes out of it.

3) no windows based ip configuration, therefore winipcfg with it's windows 32-bit base doesn't exist in 2000. you have to type ipconfig and it brings up a lovely, gay DOS box and let's hope that the box doesn't "close on exit"

4) Too many DLL files, it's a mess.


So over all, if you want an OS...use the one that your currently using, if your using a 9x kernel, and want to goto Me, just do it and wait for whistler, because whistler is removing a lot of it's dll crap, and making it for both home and work, and it'll be the gaming stable OS that people are looking for.

P.S: 0 problems with Windows Me as of this date, running it since April 2000 in it's beta stages.




------------------
-------------------------
Because I can.....
-------------------------
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users