Compatible Support Forums: system page file

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

system page file

#1 User is offline   badboy 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 05 May 2000 - 07:58 PM

According to Microsofts white paper on tweaking Windows 2000 if you have a second hard drives they recommend storeing your system page file on you second drive which makes Windows run faster does anybody know where this file is stored or how to do this !!!
0

#2 User is offline   LM 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 11-January 00

Posted 05 May 2000 - 09:36 PM

right click on My Computer,
Properties,
Advanced,
Performance options(?)
allows you to set page file size on all your drives or partitions
I believe there would be a greater perfomance increase if the second hard drive was on a different IDE channel
0

#3 User is offline   FrogMaster 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 451
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 05 May 2000 - 10:45 PM

LM is right.
Put your pagefile on another drive, if possible the fastest of your setup, on a separate channel.
I have Win2K system on the first partition of HD 1 on ide 1 and the swap file on another drive on channel 1 of ATA66 : fast and clean swaps smile
0

#4 User is offline   badboy 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 05 May 2000 - 10:41 PM

Thanks for the advice I have moved my swap file to my other hard drive I will see if I get a performance gain I have set a minimum of 500mb and a max of 1000mb is that to large !!!!
0

#5 User is offline   LM 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 11-January 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 12:59 AM

the 500-1000 page file is probably overkill...how much physical RAM do you have?
after using your system for a while, check the max memory usage, then you can set the page file so that your physical ram + page file is a bit larger than your max memory usage


[This message has been edited by LM (edited 06 May 2000).]
0

#6 User is offline   badboy 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 01:31 AM

I have 256mb pc100 sdram windows recommends a minimum page file of 382mb and a max 764mb, memory usage is 160060k / 1021700k this is after running for a while.
0

#7 User is offline   YuppieScum 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 617
  • Joined: 16-July 99

Posted 06 May 2000 - 04:21 AM

It's a good idea to set the page/swap file to a single size for both min and max - that way it doesn't fragment.

Unless, of course, you dedicate an entire drive to it...
0

#8 User is offline   Arin 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 449
  • Joined: 05-March 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 04:32 AM

I have an old cold war craptastic 200 meg hardrive... should i put that in there as a slave to my cdr and make that deticated to swap? would that speed stuff up?
0

#9 User is offline   CUViper 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1120
  • Joined: 23-January 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 05:43 AM

no, putting it on a 200 meg drive would probably be worse than if it were fragmented. A drive that old is probably WAY slow, and you want the swap file to be as fast as possible.
0

#10 User is offline   YuppieScum 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 617
  • Joined: 16-July 99

Posted 06 May 2000 - 07:01 AM

If using IDE, don't have other devices on the swap channel - especially if it is a CDR, unless you need more coasters.
0

#11 User is offline   badboy 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 11:55 AM

Is it better then that I set the the swap file to a minimum of 328mb and a maximum of 328 mb on the other drive to stop fragmentation.
0

#12 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 02:30 PM

yes
0

#13 User is offline   badboy 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 06 May 2000 - 03:07 PM

To you gentlemen I take off my hat thankyou. smile
0

#14 User is offline   Maniac_NL 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 08-May 00

Posted 08 May 2000 - 05:39 PM

Some programs doesn't work when you put your pagefile on a other drive frown
0

#15 User is offline   badboy 

  • member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 142
  • Joined: 08-March 00

Posted 08 May 2000 - 06:36 PM

I have put the page file on my other drive and everything seems to to fine so far if any thing an increase in performance.
0

#16 User is offline   Dragon-Lord 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: 11-March 00

Posted 08 May 2000 - 06:24 PM

Excuse me? Could you be a bit more specific? I find it hard to believe that any program could have problems with the location of the page file, since the OS handles memory allocation (virtual versus real), not the program itself...

What's the scoop?

:}
0

#17 User is offline   Maniac_NL 

  • newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27
  • Joined: 08-May 00

Posted 09 May 2000 - 11:28 PM

mostly games
example need for speed 5

(i know, it's just a game)
0

#18 User is offline   LM 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 53
  • Joined: 11-January 00

Posted 10 May 2000 - 01:43 AM

yeah, can you provide more information...have you tested this? NFS5 works better or worse depending on where the page file is located??
the program wouldn't even know the difference between page file and physical memory, so I don't understand how this would affect it
0

#19 User is offline   Dragon-Lord 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 275
  • Joined: 11-March 00

Posted 10 May 2000 - 02:51 AM

yes, I still don't believe that there can be any connection. Programs don't access VM, only the system does.

Perhaps there can be issues with using a page file on the same drive as a drive-intensive game, but that would be a different issue.

:}
0

#20 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 10 May 2000 - 04:12 AM

Ideally you don't want to put the swap file on the same partition/drive as one with high I/O activity (namely the system partition). I put my pagefile on a different partition on this machine and on a different RAID5 array on my server here and the servers at work. There are some trade-offs to keep in mind though. Say, if you had 2HDs with one partition each. You would have the system root on one and maybe SQL7 on another. I wouldn't recommend putting the pagefile on the same partition as the SQL7 install due to constant activity. I usually locate the pagefile on a non-system partition that is more file-only based. No constantly running apps accessing it, just files that may get hit on a moderate basis.

------------------
Regards,

clutch
0

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users