Why are you running Linux?
#1
Posted 15 October 2002 - 07:13 PM
#2
Posted 15 October 2002 - 10:47 PM
BTW I found a driver in the end. :):D
Paul.
#3
Posted 16 October 2002 - 10:17 AM
At the moment though, the main reason is because Windows and decent routing software won't run on a 486DX4/100 with 32Mb RAM and a Hercules graphics card whereas Linux and iptables are perfectly happy in even less than that.
However the customisation, stability, security and to an extent evil Bill (;)) have all played their part over the years.
#4
Posted 16 October 2002 - 05:00 PM
#5
Posted 16 October 2002 - 09:02 PM
The basic reason is to be windepent, and more importantly, I can't afford several copies of Windows AND MS Office for the computers of my family members all at the same time. Nor do I see justification to do so in an upgrade after upgrade (I doubt if many of us will use MS Office the way those corporate data/IT professionals use, or many of us see the really need to upgrade from Win98/2k to XP as necessary, if just to run our favorite apps).
The way I see it, Linux and GPL are indispensable to the open source scene we have these days, and the releases of mozilla.org and Open Office in addition to LAMP and perhaps Gimp are significant as well. The only complaint I can make is the lack of games and media/web authoring applications, which also began to catch up now (eg. Cinerella, Blender, Audacity, and Quanta; but a killer audio/MIDI production app is still pending). There are still more mileages to cover to achieve a level-playing field. But I am optimistic, considering internet is the great propellor of (computing and other) knowledge productions and distributions.
#6
Posted 17 October 2002 - 03:57 AM
Currently, a server class install of Red Hat 7.2. Mandrake is optimised for Pentium processors and as such probably won't even install on that machine. The video card (it's a combination Hercules monochrome/CGA card IIRC but I keep it in Herc mode because text looks best at 720x400) would most likely screw NT over and I have no plans to upgrade it any time soon (I do most of its configuration via SSH so doesn't need anything really fancy at its end).
#7
Posted 27 June 2003 - 12:40 PM
Just tired of M$ Windowz Claiming it's greatness when it sux. ..Let me see.. Accessing various ms sites when I already blocked them? How about THEIR ads? humm .NET I don't want it.. yet I have removed it 17.. oh wait it is there again. ..other items appearing when I didn't ask for them..? (..I am not bitter.. ..ok so maybe a little bit. )
how about Intel releasing chips when they knew they were bad? Sounds just like M$.. NEway
But I do like my games.. ( Help.. please.. WINE ..)
Lindows.. If only I wouldn't have to re-pay for updates. Humm sounds fishy.. (but it aint Windows
-Corvus
#8
Posted 27 June 2003 - 10:32 PM
#10
Posted 14 September 2003 - 04:58 PM
i think tux could kick his ass any day 8)
#11
Posted 14 September 2003 - 07:01 PM
Humm.. I THink only one of those answers would be "0" anyways. )
Those that use the site KNOW Linux exists. And those that really don't probably never will be seen here ) Oh well.
-Corvus
#12
Posted 22 September 2003 - 06:52 PM
and now my reason is i just can't stop useing it i like having a os that is capable of doing almost anything with enough work.
Viva-La-Penguin
#13
Posted 23 September 2003 - 03:38 AM
#14
Posted 23 September 2003 - 04:51 PM
as far as windows goes i refuse to use an operating system that has flaws purposely designed in it
#15
Posted 23 September 2003 - 04:57 PM
the people that talk about how hard suse is to just run (i'm not talking about console commands just running it) are treating it like windows
microsoft is losing money and i think that they will just continue to lose more, as more and more people become aware of the better options like macs and linux.
well i'm going to stop for a while before i continue to rant and rave about M$
#16
Posted 23 September 2003 - 06:40 PM
) true Linux is getting better in regaurds to ease of installing, and users can use it like windows. Some programs are just in a different place (and named differently too.. boo-hoo Ever look at someone's machine that they setup themselves anyways? Granted file names are basically the same.) So much for huge learning curve, but then some don't like a slight bend.
I think one of the better examples is RedHat as it ID all of my hardware correctly (Minus one of the two on-board NICS). And basic graphical layout is similar enough to get one started with out knowing anything. Oh well... atleast with the one that works I can find drivers for the second.
Hey.. look.. very little rant 'n rave.. But can't that go without saying? ) hehe
#17
Posted 23 September 2003 - 06:54 PM
but anyway back a little bit closer to the topic
i use linux simply because it is already better than everything else out there (i like it better than OSX because of its flexability)
my last install of suse i would feel sorry for the newbie that touched it i had 6 partitions on my main hd (its a single user computer) and things as someone in KLUG (kalamazoo linux users group) said "were in the wrong place" because of where things were on partitions but it worked for my and i knew exactly where things were. i'm installing gentoo new becasue its the laatest and greatest shiny thing (i have other more intelligent reasons)
just useing linux doesn't involve a big learning curve anymore like it used to with some distros depending on what you do you can completly avoid using the terminal (i have yet to find a user who does this)
well i have to go to class now ;(
#18
Posted 23 September 2003 - 07:07 PM
If anyone wounders XP(.. forget ME - go back to 98SE) .
I kina found it useful (to me) to place things where I want.
"Hey..looky that.. I found it! and so fast!"
#19
Posted 24 September 2003 - 05:47 PM
#20
Posted 24 September 2003 - 05:53 PM

Help










