Compatible Support Forums: Weird network problems.

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Weird network problems.

#1 User is offline   hi_robb 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 11-April 00

Posted 06 November 2000 - 05:07 PM

Lo there,

I have 3 machines at home all running Win2000 which are networked together.

I'm using standard BNC on every machine.

The network was put together ages and ages ago when I ran win95, and as all the cables are in the walls I don't really want to start changing to something else.

1st things 1st, installed on each machine is the following.

Client for Microsnot networks
TCP/IP
File and Printer sharing for Ms Networks.

I'm using the 10.0.0.x ip set for each machine.

I can see all computers on the network from each other machine. Network neighbourhood shows them all up etc etc.

The problem I have is when I map a network drive from one machine eg: \\machine_name\c$

It maps perfectly but, if i leave it for a wihle then goto My_Computer to access it again it shows a big red cross through it as though its lost the mapping.

Simply double clicking on it opens access again and the red cross vanishes. Question is why is that red X appearing after a while. I'v timed it and its not a fixed time thing its quite random.

While its a simple problem its driving me mad.

Anyone got an suggestions?

TIA

Dave
0

#2 User is offline   CUViper 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1120
  • Joined: 23-January 00

Posted 07 November 2000 - 03:13 AM

That just indicates that it's not actually connected to the remote computer, as it hasn't used any of the resources in a while. It's perfectly normal...
0

#3 User is offline   hi_robb 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 11-April 00

Posted 07 November 2000 - 04:47 AM

Yep,

I found the answer at long last
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q138/3/65.asp

smile

Dave
0

#4 User is offline   CUViper 

  • old hand
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1120
  • Joined: 23-January 00

Posted 07 November 2000 - 05:57 AM

hehe - from that page:

Quote:
This is approximately 8,171 years (not tested),


how the hell would you test that?

thanks for the link though, very useful...
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users