Compatible Support Forums: win2k/win9x/me networking slowdown

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

win2k/win9x/me networking slowdown

#1 User is offline   Lord-Data 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 31-August 00

Posted 18 September 2000 - 12:57 PM

just curious, is this just a win2k(nt?) 'feature', but when i browse the network and access a machines list of shares, it takes a notibly long time to get a responce. iv reinstalled windows a number of times on both machines, and yet refreshing/loading either are slow. once its got the list of shares, everythign is instant, and transfers are fast, just browsing. not sure whats going on. anyone got any ideas?

------------------
<A HREF="http://www.thewolfslair.com
" TARGET=_blank>www.thewolfslair.com
</A>
0

#2 User is offline   Radelon 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 18-August 00

Posted 19 September 2000 - 09:42 AM

just curious but I can't get my win2k/winme/win98 combination to even talk to each other. Can you tell me how you got yours to work.
0

#3 User is offline   Lord-Data 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 31-August 00

Posted 19 September 2000 - 11:24 AM

chances are your win2k machine can happily talk to the winme/win9x machines, browse them, but the win9x/me boxes cant browse teh win2k machine.
well, thats what i had originally anyway. win2k is nt based, and tries to be secure. unless tehres a way to turn this off (which i dont know, any one got any ideas?) then you have to add the win9x machines to win2k's user list. Ie, if you have the win98 machine's login name and password as abc/def, you need to create a user to the same specifications on the win2k machine (users control panel), then the machine will work. Its good in a way, coz you can set shares for certain users only, etc.

------------------
<A HREF="http://www.thewolfslair.com
" TARGET=_blank>www.thewolfslair.com
</A>
0

#4 User is offline   Radelon 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 18-August 00

Posted 19 September 2000 - 04:22 PM

I have that part figured out......but I can't even get them to talk at all......I need to figure out the actual LAN setup....i.e. Protocols and setup.....
0

#5 User is offline   Lord-Data 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 31-August 00

Posted 22 September 2000 - 11:16 AM

well, as long as they all have the same protocols it shoudl be fine
my setup has ipx/spx and tcp/ip.
i have my win2k machine set as 192.168.0.1, with internet connection sharing providing a dhcp server for the otehr machines on the network. theyr all set to automatic, with the dns and gateway fields filled in, and all is fine.

------------------
<A HREF="http://www.thewolfslair.com
" TARGET=_blank>www.thewolfslair.com
</A>
0

#6 User is offline   OLEerror 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 326
  • Joined: 29-September 00

Posted 03 October 2000 - 06:15 PM

Basically, don't use network browsing with Windows 2000. It uses about 38% of the available bandwidth. Instead, access your other computers using a UNC (ie. \\workstation1\c$\share). It will get rid of the slowdown problem, and leave your bandwidth open.
0

#7 User is offline   Lord-Data 

  • journeyman
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 79
  • Joined: 31-August 00

Posted 04 October 2000 - 03:51 AM

well, network bandwidth isnt exactly a problem for me at most times, its mainly at lan parties when i dont know the names/workgroups or other machines that i have to use it. Otherwise, locally, yes, i use direct accessing

------------------
<A HREF="http://www.thewolfslair.com
" TARGET=_blank>www.thewolfslair.com
</A>
0

#8 User is offline   bobbinbrisco 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 366
  • Joined: 30-July 00

Posted 22 August 2001 - 11:02 AM

Quote:

... access your other computers using a UNC (ie. \workstation1\c$\share). It will get rid of the slowdown problem, and leave your bandwidth open.


how would i do this?
0

#9 User is offline   Xiven 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 690
  • Joined: 21-May 00

Posted 22 August 2001 - 11:54 AM

Quote:

Delete this key in the registry and reboot:

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\RemoteComputer\NameSpace\{D6277990-4C6A-11CF-8D87-00AA0060F5BF}]

This key makes win2k look for scheduled tasks and is causing the delay when browsing win9x-machines.

/Toby

0

#10 User is offline   bobbinbrisco 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 366
  • Joined: 30-July 00

Posted 25 August 2001 - 01:14 PM

does this also speed up the browsing when using the winme box?
0

#11 User is offline   Xiven 

  • addict
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 690
  • Joined: 21-May 00

Posted 27 August 2001 - 10:09 PM

no smile
0

#12 User is offline   dasshutzenfest 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 29-August 01

Posted 29 August 2001 - 11:29 PM

Get all the machines on TCP/IP and Client for MS Networks (if 95/98/ME). Use 192.168.110.xxx as the subnet, use 255.255.255.0 as the subnet mask, and use [whatever] as your DF IP if you have a router.
Specify everyone on the same workgroup name. I'm assuming you aren't running a domain.... Enable file and print sharing and share the resources you want to share.
0

#13 User is offline   bobbinbrisco 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 366
  • Joined: 30-July 00

Posted 31 August 2001 - 09:10 AM

i use 192.168.0.x for my ip addresses is that okay or does it slow down the network??
0

#14 User is offline   DosFreak 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3885
  • Joined: 04-February 00

Posted 01 September 2001 - 04:12 AM

It really doesn't matter what IP you use. The IP that you set does not "slow down" your network. It doesn't matter if it starts with a 1 or ends with a 254 those numbers mean nothing for speed. As long as the IP that you use is not shared. Also as long as you use Private IP ranges your safer on the net too. Due to private IP's being nonroutable.
0

#15 User is offline   bobbinbrisco 

  • enthusiast
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 366
  • Joined: 30-July 00

Posted 04 September 2001 - 11:19 AM

so there's noway to speed up the browsing of the network (of win2k boxes)in winme?
0

#16 User is offline   Anything 

  • stranger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 08-September 01

Posted 12 September 2001 - 07:48 AM

If you had a browse master it would work a lot quicker.

Unfortunately, the best way to do this is to setup a linux box.

Offtopic: Does anyone know how to tell 2000 to not participate in the smb browse master war?

Anything..
0

#17 User is offline   clutch 

  • Carpal Tunnel
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3859
  • Joined: 29-March 00

Posted 12 September 2001 - 08:08 AM


0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users